×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

response modification factor for concrete connection

response modification factor for concrete connection

response modification factor for concrete connection

(OP)
I am designing a bridge pier with columns and a cap at the top. The system works as a moment frame during an EQ. I perform an elastic seismic analysis based on the response spectrum to get axial, moment, and shear. Time to design the rebar...

The column rebar will be governed by the moment at the connection. Code says I can divide the moment by R=5.0 (lets say). However, connections must be designed w/ R=1.0. (AASHTO 3.10.7)  I believe it is the same principal in ACI and ASCE 7, I just can't identify the appropriate section numbers.

How do you design the rebar? In the past, I've just use R=1.0 for everything. Now I'm trying to be a little more economical.

RE: response modification factor for concrete connection

According to

AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 4th Edition (2007)

table 3.10.7.1-2 response modification for (connections...)

Columns, piers, or pile bents to cap beam or superstructure   

and

Columns and piers to foundations

R=1

TO is the key word here. My understanding of this TO is the shear friction transfer of forces and longitudinal forces in rebars for the connection, or if you find it more proper following the case, the elements of the strut and tie in the transfer need be all able for R=1
 

RE: response modification factor for concrete connection

(OP)
Thank you for your thoughts. I generally agree with you. The sentiment of the code seems to be that connections should be capacity protected. Shear friction capacity definitely falls under that criteria.

The problem comes w/ the longitudinal rebar for the connection under moment. If I design the rebar @ M_eq/R for the column, but then have to check the rebar @ M_eq/1.0 for the connection, the rebar will be too small by a factor of R.

I think the code just doesn't have enough verbiage to explain what it wants. But since I have to design to what the code says, I am at a loss.

Everyone's thoughts are appreciated.

RE: response modification factor for concrete connection

For the longitudinal rebar this means that in the length of splice for the bigger force and rebar at the connection, the splice needs be designed as per the code; then that means that you will have in piers 2 rebar end regions and 1 central, the end ones meeting the capacity for R=1, that is my view. For tall enough piers, that shouldn't be a problem, nor for long enough piles.

On splices,

pier end with pile cap, as rebar with full capacity at R=1

pier end with central region of pier, as with worse at pier with R=5 or corresponding R, or maybe with engineering judgement you need not even take the max value at end with R=5, maybe even less is sufficient, given the point where the splice is to be made, more inwards than the ends.

Ans so on in piles with pile caps, or piers with pile bents.

RE: response modification factor for concrete connection

(OP)
If I am understanding you properly...

For dowel bars that come up from the footing and into the column, design the dowel bars for bending w/ R=1.0.

Then for the smaller main column bars that lap w/ the dowels, design main column bars for bending w/ R=5.0.

The lap will be governed by the smaller (column) bar. I guess since the dowel is the connection "TO" the footing, it is OK if the lap fails from R=1.0?

And if I have a short column with a large dowel, then i just end up carrying the large dowel the entire height of the column?

Does anyone else also have an opinion?

Thanks in advance.

RE: response modification factor for concrete connection

Yes, you could dimension as you say the splices "on a permissive understanding" of the clause code. If restrictive, for short piers you should go with the larger section for the whole height, and for tall enough piers then define 2 end sections with sections with demands in accord with R=1 (the larger), and with splices for the inner section as you say, dimensioned with the forces for R=5 and at point of splice, since already in the column and "no" notional connection. This of course if the pier tall enough to make such changes worth.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources