×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

LPG Sphere - cone deflector

LPG Sphere - cone deflector

LPG Sphere - cone deflector

(OP)
Hello everyone,

Does anyone knows if the NFPA prohibits the use of deflector cone on top of a LPG sphere? and if it's true, in which standard is mentioned.

The doubt is coming because the client want use cone deflector instead a fire protection ring with sprinkler

As a reference parameter the average wind velocity it's around 1.5 m/s.

Thanks
Israel

RE: LPG Sphere - cone deflector

I think NFPA does not address such systems. I´m not sure since I´m not very familiar with LPG and spheres.

API´s point of view from "API 2030 Application of Fixed Water Spray Systems for Fire Protection in the Petroleum and Petrochemical Industries" says...

"Alternative designs for protection of LPG storage spheres are in common use and are generally acceptable. As discussed in API 2510/2510A, these designs can involve one or more very large discharge nozzles at the top of the sphere, along wit some type of distribution system such as a weir. The design objective is to create a uniform film of water that covers the critical portions of the sphere´s surface."

On the following lines, it clarifies that spray nozzles or monitor protection are needed for the lower part of the sphere and for the dry spots near the supporting structure.

In my opinion, I would not use them for the following reasons:

- I thin layer of clear water is not good to cool from radiant heat. So your are using water to cool, but not in the best way.
- It is difficult to control the water distribution uniform.
- They are less efficient (I would add more water as a flow safety factor).
- Since the spray NFPA 15 is needed for the other areas. I´d follow a standard practice and avoid a "special" costly performance based design.
- In case of fire I´m not sure on what the insurance company would about a special deluge systems.
- I´m not sure if this systems would enter in the NFPA´s  "performance based option" design category, I´d try to avoid this.

I´ve seen this old central application of water on cylindrical tanks with cone roofs, they are not recommended now, since it is known that the heat percentage that receives the roof is not very significant and the water distribution on the tank vertical walls is very inefficient.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources