×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

(OP)
I ran into an interesting scenario that I wasn't sure of the best way to handle. I'd like to define a feature that exists at MMC, but doesn't exist in the nominal profile of the part.

The particular geometry that I'm looking at is a machined radius that breaks out of a cast surface. I'd like the surface to continue on at an angled taper when the casting is at MMC, rather than for the radius to continue to turn outward. Trouble is, I'm not sure how to define the taper, since it doesn't exist at nominal tolerance.

I suppose that I could model the casting at MMC with a unidirectional profile, but I can see that causing all sorts of trouble with the casting vendor. Is it legal to define the remainder of the profile with phantom lines? Thoughts?

Thanks for the help.

//signed//
Christopher K. Hubley
Mechanical Engineer
Sunpower Incorporated
Athens, Ohio
--
http://engineeringliberty.wordpress.com

RE: How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

Phantom lines are fine, but you should add a note indicating what they represent.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services  www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc.  www.tec-ease.com

RE: How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

First, I would blow-up the undercut area so details are seen clearly.
Then, use phantom lines.
Then pick the appropriate note. The features / dimensions that disappear after machining sometimes are marked as "NON-MANDATORY REQUIREMENT". Another good term is "PEMISSIBLE". It implies that feature may appear under some conditions.
Just a personal approach though.
 

RE: How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

(OP)
Thanks for the advice. I put together a sketch of the definition, but it seems to be a bit of a mess. Any suggestions for cleaning it up?

PNG Image
SVG Image  

RE: How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

(OP)
I forgot to include it in my sketch, but the vertical surface is located with a +/- tolerance. I believe that's legit per ASME Y14.5-1994 (kind of a combination of figs 6-18 and 6-23)... but check me on that.

PNG Image (Updated)
SVG Image (Updated)

RE: How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

(OP)
Whoops, that second SVG Image should have been this one.
 

RE: How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

Looks ok, except the +/- tolerance.  The figures that you cite both reference directly opposed points, which makes them features of size.  What you indicate seems to be a stepped surface, not a feature of size, so +/- is not the preferred means of locating that surface.  Profile of a Surface is more appropriate.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services  www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc.  www.tec-ease.com

RE: How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

(OP)
Jim,
Thanks for the insight. So, you're thinking profile along the whole surface, then? Works for me, but I'll have to sell it to the product definition folks (seems like profile tolerance scares them for some reason... some bollocks about difficult inspection).

Well, it seems like a bit of a mess, but I can't think of any cleaner way to present it. They're currently specifying a maximum step from the cast surface and that undercuts are not allowed in a note. That's fine, but it'd force the manufacturer to set their cutter path based on wherever the cast surface winds up for each individual part.

I'm suggesting that they move the nominal radius north a smidge and forget about the max step requirement, but set the tolerances such that you never have an undercut. Should be a cost savings there, I think.

Anyhow, here's the updated doodle:
PNG Image (Updated)
SVG Image (Updated)

RE: How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

That looks about right.  Personally, I'd force a cut deeper into the radius to ensure it's cleaned up regardless; "olde days" wouldn't have been an issue because manual machining would have contacted the surface before starting the cut but CNC likes to start at a predetermined location (unless they have force feedback capability in the mill/lathe).

I just love when people say Profile is too hard to inspect ... I quickly provide a redirection in their geometric philosophies.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services  www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc.  www.tec-ease.com

RE: How to define a feature that isn't in the nominal profile

(OP)
Jim,
I had them set the radial position such that when the cast surface is at MMC and the machined surface is at LMC the surfaces line up exactly (i.e. no step); the intent is to avoid an undercut since it would unnecessarily weaken the part. I also amended the note to read:
TAPER MAY NOT BE INCLUDED IN MACHINED PROFILE DEPENDING ON MATERIAL CONDITION. BLEND BREAKOUT TO R1.3 [R.051] MINIMUM.
I think that the blend note should sufficiently clean up the cusp.
Thanks for the advice... I had a hard time finding an example of this sort of breakout, but I think that the definition above should adequately communicate the requirement to the manufacturer.
Defining geometry that doesn't exist in the cast profile is a bit tricky; I wasn't sure if using phantom lines was legal, but I think that the note clears things up in this instance.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources