Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login




Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Reinforced Concrete-Block Load-Bearing Wall & Basic Wind Speed Helpful Member!(2) 

DCEngr1 (Structural) (OP)
10 Apr 12 11:18
In general, did the implementation of 90 mph wind speeds, as opposed to the former 70 mph speeds in the code, affect an increase in the amount of reinforcing required in load-bearing 8-inch concrete-block walls that support roof loads with steel bar joists?  The structure I am concerned with is a movie theater with high walls to accomodate a sloping floor and the screen height in the seating area.   
Helpful Member!  JedClampett (Structural)
10 Apr 12 12:31
There might be a small difference, with the 90 mph wind slightly increasing the amount of vertical steel. But the big change was the elimination of the 1/3 allowable stress increase from UBC to IBC for wind load combinations.
Helpful Member!  hawkaz (Structural)
10 Apr 12 14:31
Check your wind load design methodology. The wind speed went from 70 mph fastest mile wind speed to 90 mph 3-sec gust wind speed and the formulae changed to accommodate. The wind pressures didn't change too significantly for the most part.  

It is my understanding that we are about to go through this wind speed confusion again.


Jed is right, the 1/3 stress increase made a bigger difference.  


 

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close