×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Enercalc "General Footing" vs "Elastic Foundation" Modules

Enercalc "General Footing" vs "Elastic Foundation" Modules

Enercalc "General Footing" vs "Elastic Foundation" Modules

(OP)
Can anybody out there give me their opinion on the relative merits of using the "Beam on Elastic Foundation" vs the basic "General Footing" or "Wall Footing" modules?  I understand the underlying differences between the 2 modules, but am struggling to see a real-world application where the "Elastic Foundation" would be a more viable option.  The basic footing checks seem much more comprehensive since, unlike the elastic analysis, they analyze for rebar as well as sliding and overturning.  Do people use the two modules in conjunction with one another?  Maybe use the elastic analysis to check the bearing pressures, and then the footing module to check the footing concrete itself?  I'm still trying to figure this one out so let me know.

RE: Enercalc "General Footing" vs "Elastic Foundation" Modules

I have used the "Elastic Foundation" to analyze the foundation of a large generator. To check the foundation for flexure, I analyzed a 1' strip of the foundations as a "beam" with the applicable point and distributed loads (from fuel and water and what not). This gave me the necessary rebar for a 1' strip

To me, this seems more applicable (for flexure) than oversimplifying the problem into a general foundation and one point load.

In this instance, the maximum shear & moment was not at the center of the foundation.

I am new to this though, so feel free to correct any flaws you see in my judgement.

RE: Enercalc "General Footing" vs "Elastic Foundation" Modules

I believe the beam on elastic foundation would be more for grade beam applications where you have a row of columns supported by a continuous grade beam as opposed to isolated pad footings.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: Enercalc "General Footing" vs "Elastic Foundation" Modules

You make me recall my structures professor saying "use your engineering ring judgment.

I use Enercalc often and have done so for years. I recommend that your read Enercalc"s module description and limitations. I design using the footing when I have columns to be supported.  You need to read ACI 318 since footing design will requires checks such as bending moment, shear and soil bearing pressure.

I use BOEF for grade beams, mats and other applications I deem appropriate. I model mats as one foot strip as was stated above.
 

Regards,
Lutfi
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources