×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Culvert Contraction/Expansion Coeffiecients of 0.6 and 0.8?

Culvert Contraction/Expansion Coeffiecients of 0.6 and 0.8?

Culvert Contraction/Expansion Coeffiecients of 0.6 and 0.8?

(OP)
I'm working with a FEMA effective HEC-RAS model that uses contraction and expansion coefficients of 0.6 and 0.8 instead of 0.3 and 0.5 at some culverts.  Chapter 5 of the manual shows that these values are used for "abrupt transitions".  I have always thought that you used 0.3 and 0.5 for cross-sections adjacent to both culverts and bridges.  Are culverts (as opposed to bridges) considered "abrupt transitions"?  What values do you typically use for culverts?  

RE: Culvert Contraction/Expansion Coeffiecients of 0.6 and 0.8?

I am accustomed to using 0.3 and 0.5, as well.  However, I've also run into several effective HEC-2 models which also use higher values.  

My thoughts are that if the channel section is relatively uniform upstream of your structure and doesn't narrow down significantly to transition to your structure, then go with the 0.3/0.5.

I've also noticed that in  many cases, changing the c/e coefficients doesn't have as large an impact on WSELs as you may suspect.  I think it really just comes down to the modeler's judgement/preference.  

Good luck!

RE: Culvert Contraction/Expansion Coeffiecients of 0.6 and 0.8?

Sorry...I forgot to add that you may also want to compare the floodplain topwidth at the structure to the structure width.  If there is a very large difference, then a 0.6/0.8 may be valid.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources