×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rooftop Units in California

Rooftop Units in California

Rooftop Units in California

(OP)
Does anybody know where the 2010 CBC (or 2009 IBC for that matter) specifies the minimum weight of a rooftop that needs to be analyzed by an engineer?  I seem to remember 400 lbs. being the cutoff that requies an analysis, but just want to find the specific section.  Thanks.

RE: Rooftop Units in California

It's in ASCE 7-05 Chapter 13, Section 13.1.4.

400 lbs is correct.

RE: Rooftop Units in California

However, that is only for the anchorage of the equipment to the roof.  The roof still needs to be checked to ensure that it is capable of supporting the equipment.

RE: Rooftop Units in California

(OP)
Perfect, thanks.  Quick follow-up question.  If the unit is 400 lb. and under that exempts us from the seismic design requirements of Chapter 13, but are we also exempt from checking gravity loads?  My RTU is a new 333 lb. unit being put on an existing building and is pretty small.  Might the city be looking for gravity calcs?

RE: Rooftop Units in California

In my opinion the 400 lbs requirement is only to exempt from seismic anchorage calculations for the unit.  I still think you need to check the roof for gravity / wind loading.

Chapter 34 of the CBC gives an exemption from checking gravity loading of the existing structure if the increased loading does not increase the internal forces of the supporting members by more than 5%.  Depending on your roof framing / support of the unit this may or may not be true.

RE: Rooftop Units in California

Be careful though.  The 5% rule is from the ORIGINAL design.  Therefore, if there are solar panels, etc on the roof from previous work that was not included in the original calculations than this allowance may have already been used.

RE: Rooftop Units in California

If the old RTU is less in weight than the original, the BD should buy that the gravity system does not have to be checked, only seismic anchorage provisions met.  

If this is a totally new weight, unless you have the original structural calcs for the roof that specifically allosed for 1 to 2 psf over the entire roof for Mechanical units/piping, etc, and the 2 psf for the concerned area of framing is greater than the weight of the unit, you should check the framing.  At the least, anyway, I would check the joists under the unit that span to any purlins.     

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources