×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASME Flange Design

ASME Flange Design

ASME Flange Design

(OP)
Trying to qualify an existing vessel with no existing paperwork. Built 1939. Everything checks out except for inspection opening. Non-standard flange, flat plate, intergral/slip-on. The deficiency report keeps failing the gasket seating or fails at the g1 weld requirement. Used existing info gathered in the field and have latest thickness readings. It has held pressure for over 70 years, but the numbers say the flange is not good. Tried different gasket, larger bolts, different weld combinations; probably have done 20 iterations, still nothing works. Any ideas?

RE: ASME Flange Design

What type of gasket are you trying?  Depending on the service, many of the old vessels I have looked at use a tackycloth type gasket that has some very low m and y values.

RE: ASME Flange Design

(OP)
Based on the information on the drawing from the old equipment file, it was an Armco soft iron. Based on an old Lamons catalog, m=3.25 and seating stress is 7,600.

RE: ASME Flange Design

Don't you just love it when "new and improved" design formulae condemn equipment that has been working beautifully for decades?!

Suggest you try a cammprofile gasket or reinforced grafoil gasket, something with a low m and y value as fegenbush alluded to.  You may also want to try low-stress bolts, or accounting for the addition of a thread lubricant with a low coefficient of friction - something that would reduce the required bolt load.

Also, are you trying to qualify the flange to withstand the force during hydrostatic test (usually the controlling load on new vessels), or just doing a rating for MAWP?

-TJ Orlowski

RE: ASME Flange Design

Is this a flat-faced flange?  Will the service possibly allow you to spec. a self-energizing gasket?  Can you make the gasket narrower and 'N' closer to the bolt circle?  Those things might help.

Low-stress bolts: also a good call.

Stainless steel or carbon steel flange and bolting?

--------------------------------
Fitter, happier, more productive

RE: ASME Flange Design

Sometimes a FEA analysis is good to compare the real stress condition with the code prescriptive formulas. If you don´t have a FEA tool it is very difficult to understand how safe is the design compared to code rules.

RE: ASME Flange Design

(OP)
TJOrlowski (Mechanical), BigTank (Mechanical),
Thank you for the replies. I ended up finding a gasket, Grafoil GHR laminate, that solved the flange situation and then, Compress would not allow me to just PWHT the flange. Turned out that there was a bug in the program. Had to run the shell cylinder, as well as the nozzle in PWHT condition, then break the report apart to submit. Compress said they would look into it.
Thanks again.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources