×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Drive System on a 4-wheeled car
3

Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

(OP)
I am currently looking into designing a 4 wheeled car that will lift steel coils and transfer them to a different location.  The following parameters are as follows:

Wt of Car w/Steel Coil: 125 kips
Velocity = 6 in/sec
Distance = 50 ft
Drive Shaft Dia = 3 in
Coeff of static friction (stl to stl) = 0.78
Wheel Diameters = 12 in

The car wheels will be steel and will be riding on steel rails.  The drive system will consist of an electric motor with a shaft mounted reducer.  The back car axle will be the drive axle.  I am assuming that I will need to calculate the torque and power required to move the car from a static position.  This would include overcoming the weight of the car as well as the frictional force from the steel wheel to steel rail contact. I believe I need to look at the total weight of the car when I am calculating the reducer torque.  Is this correct?  Is there any other item(s) that I need figure?  

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

mizzoumech,

   You have asked a very broad question that makes it sound like you are in over your head.  

   There ought to be someone at your site who understands cars like this, and who can answer your questions.  How do the coils get on and off this thing?  How are you going to stop it rolling?  Is there hardware at your site people would prefer you used?  If nothing else, sixty tons of equipment rolling back and forth, sounds like a safety hazard.  Perhaps you should refuse the work.

               JHG

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Your assumptions are fundamentally incomplete, and what is there is incorrect .  

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Where did you get the coefficient of friction?  That is a value for sliding friction, not rolling friction.

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

(OP)
I have reviewed my P.E. book and my Mark's Handbook.  dvd is right that this is rolling friction and not sliding friction since the wheels will utilize pillow block roller bearings.  I am upgrading an existing working car design that another company built.  Since I wasn't involved in this existing working design, I am leaving no stone unturned so I wanted to start from the basics.  Thank you dvd and Medeski.

A good engineer knows what he doesn't know but can always eventually find the answer...Never be afraid of asking a question.  Even if some of your peers might think it is stupid.   

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

They make "trucks" or for lack of a better term "baby locomotives" that may solve your problem...

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Read your original post again.  Can you honestly say that you don't think it reads like a homework problem?  An engineering problem would not have the statement

Quote:

I believe I need to look at the total weight of the car when I am calculating the reducer torque.  Is this correct?  Is there any other item(s) that I need figure?

Engineering is about the details, not about the physics.  The physics defines the boundary conditions.  Engineering places the components within the boundaries.  I would hope an 11 year engineer who is either studying for or has his P.E. would know that.

David

 

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Wheels occasionally have to roll over debris on the track, so don't get too carried away in reducing friction.  You may need some reserve for unanticipated events.  

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Just off the top of my head, 15+ tons on a 12" wheel sounds a little high, but don't take my word for it.  Look up manufacturers' crane wheel ratings, which I think require you to select a rail section first....

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Be careful with cast iron pillow block bearings which may receive shock loading.  Make sure that the loading direction and magnitude is endorsed by the bearing manufacturer.  Consider steel housings if there is any question.

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Quote (mizzoumech):

Coeff of static friction (stl to stl) = 0.78

That is a common value found on the 'web, however I've yet to see that in real life.
Could someone elaborate that for me, or give a situation where friciton as high as 0.78 (or about that) is happening?

my findings: www.youtube.com/watch?v=558Htmux6UE
And that shows a more common and realistic scenario.

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Any of the friction coefficient values like that are from studies in vacuum from half a century ago.  It is amazing how they have been perpetuated with no fact checking for so long.

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

King -

Maybe rubber tires on dry concrete.  A Cf of .78 for steel on steel is unheard off.  That's why trains use steel wheels and steel rails.  The Cf is very low which makes starting and stopping a bit of a problem - but once up to speed there is virtually no friction.

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Quote:


The Cf is very low which makes starting and stopping a bit of a problem - but once up to speed there is virtually no friction.

I'd say the hardness of the steel allows for low rolling resistance due to less deformation of the wheel.  The crappy coefficient of friction is merely an unwanted side effect.  Hence adding sand, grit, etc between wheel and rail when extra tractive effort is desirable.   

RE: Drive System on a 4-wheeled car

Since this car is going only 50 feet , why not design it like a csble car. It might be simpler and wheel friction dependence would be eliminated as well as starting and stopping.
Just a thought....  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources