×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rolled W section with different flange widths

Rolled W section with different flange widths

Rolled W section with different flange widths

(OP)
We're load rating a group of monorails for a pulp mill (1930's to 1950's steel) and we found one monorail was rolled with different top flange to bottom flange dimensions:

Depth: 10.25 in.
Bottom flange width: 4.5 in.
Bottom flange thickness: 0.375 in.
Top flange width: 5.75 in.
Top flange thickness: 0.5 in.

I've never heard of rolled sections ever having different top and bottom flanges. Can anyone shed any light onto the history of such a section?

EIT with BS in Civil/Structural engineering.

RE: Rolled W section with different flange widths

Might have been a "special"??

RE: Rolled W section with different flange widths

I think these beams were created in Canada because Canadians are so out of balance.  bigsmile

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com
 

RE: Rolled W section with different flange widths

You sure its a rolled shape?

Could be Tramrail, Tarca Track, Trambeam....etc.

Many makers of this type of beam.

If it is one of these types, you will not be able to load rate because they are proprietary sections.

Usually there is a high strength hardened t-shape full pen welded to another t-shape cut from a standard rolled section for the top.  

RE: Rolled W section with different flange widths

(OP)
Well, this is certainly a wealth of information.

BAretired: Thanks! This is exactly the term I needed. The Sydney University report is definitely useful.

msquared48: ;)

ToadJones: I'm confidant it's rolled. I attached a picture of the beam in my original post and I can't see any weld lines down the beam. The flange fillets are nicely defined concave surfaces so if it was welded there it's very nicely hidden.

Keep in mind the age of this steel, I'm confident it's at least 30 years old if not older. It doesn't appear to match either the Tarcatrack or TCAmerican sections.

Even if it was though, why would I not be able to load rate it? Just because it's proprietary doesn't mean I can't figure out it's section properties.

Thanks for all your help everyone. It always amazes me the wealth of knowledge on this community.

EIT with BS in Civil/Structural engineering.

RE: Rolled W section with different flange widths

Sorry, I missed the picture.

You cannot load rate it because you do not know the materials and from my experience, the manufacturer will not give them to you.
With the patented track the easiest thing to do is ask the OEM for a load rating. They will usually do so for free.
But, that's a moot point since it appears you have a mono beam...

Sorry to waste your time.  

RE: Rolled W section with different flange widths

(OP)
ToadJones: No problem. However, given the age of the steel and/or practicality why not just assume A36 and just design it for that?

Or, worst case I could just cut a sample out of a flange and have it tested.

EIT with BS in Civil/Structural engineering.

RE: Rolled W section with different flange widths

Well, I have gone that route before and what you find is that with the reduced bottom flange, the tensile stress sometimes controls the design, especially when you assumed a material like A36. So you wind up with monorails or underhung bridges that may have been designed for 5 tons, failing at 1 ton. That's not helping the customer much.

In your case, that's probably a fair assumption. just qualify in your analysis that you assumed "X" for the material.

In the case of patented track it usually does not work.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources