COUNTER WEIGHT
COUNTER WEIGHT
(OP)
Calling on hard-core mechanical engineers. I am an ME but this is above me.
I have a rotating structure A that rotates at a slow 1 rpm. Attached to one end via a turn-table bearing I have structure B.
I do not want B to rotate and cannot fix it to any thing external. There will be a very small force wanting it to rock slightly which I do not want. How can I hold it stationary? A friend mentioned a Coriolis effect
or a flywheel with a motor attached to keep B stationary.
Any thoughts would be most appreciated.
I have a rotating structure A that rotates at a slow 1 rpm. Attached to one end via a turn-table bearing I have structure B.
I do not want B to rotate and cannot fix it to any thing external. There will be a very small force wanting it to rock slightly which I do not want. How can I hold it stationary? A friend mentioned a Coriolis effect
or a flywheel with a motor attached to keep B stationary.
Any thoughts would be most appreciated.





RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
I don't see how coriolis effect will help you.
Is A's shaft horizontal? How about putting a large weight on the lower side of B. This will not eliminate movement, but it will reduce it.
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
Ted
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
A gyro type is what I had in mind. I think it would work but not sure how to size a wheel.
Yes. Shaft A is horizontal. I have room for a large weight at bottom but as you pointed out it still could move slightly.
Magnet would work except anything off the sides,top or bottom is not possible.
Going back to the gyro idea. If I put , for an example and large heavy wheel (ever seen spin bike wheel?) mount it on the bottom of B and put a motor on it with the axis of rotation at a right angle to rotational shaft. Am I way off base?
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
Ted
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
Make B out of aluminum or copper and place a strong magnet close by. This will form an eddy current damper.
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
http://mmcengineering.tripod.com
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
I have a new pdf showing the gyroscope cweight to keep B from rotating.
Guys , Will this fly?
Repeat
I have a rotating structure A that rotates at a slow 1 rpm. Attached to one end via a turn-table bearing I have structure B.
I do not want B to rotate and cannot fix it to any thing external. There will be a very small force wanting it to rock slightly which I do not want. How can I hold it stationary? A friend mentioned a Coriolis effect
or a flywheel with a motor attached to keep B stationary.
Any thoughts would be most appreciated.
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
Fe (IronX32)
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
My bad. Thanks so much for pointing that out.
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
I would sit down and carefully analyse your gyro befor I finalized this. I am not the expert on them. I worked one out a few years ago, and it did not work out very well. The gyro must be large compared to whatever it is stabilizing. You must deliver power to it. All the gyro does is increase the inertia. There will still be movement.
Don't confuse stabilizing gyros, and gyros that communicate with actuators. On gyro-stabilized platforms, the gyro is just a sensor.
If you can get electric cables to your gyro, you can get a non-electric cables to it. Cables, electric or otherwise, will prevent rotation of your device.
You could use slip rings to power your gyro.
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
If the axis is horizontal,as you show, then the overweight eccentric at the bottom seems reasonable, but the torque on A is steady due to bearing friction plus an oscillatory component due to variations in this torque. The heavier the weight the better the response. You could add damping effect by linking that weight to the bottom rather bolting and have it slide having an effective classical damper.
Your spinning mass does nothing, since the gyroscopic forces are in the wrong plane for correction, so the socalled gyroscopic effect does not work here.
If you truly need zero motion, which I am skeptical of, then the only thing I can think of is a closed loop induction plate rotating opposite, which will afford corrective motion plus damping. I don't think you want to go there unless you have lots of time and money.
Personally, I vote for the overweight bottom system.
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
You all are awesome and thanks so much for your valuable input.
Based on all the feedback a eccentric cweight might be the best approach. I can afford a slight rock. My best guess at this point stationary A should be 300 pounds. A counter weight hanging off the bottom and evenmounted a a slide might just do the trick.
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
You haven't given any options for alternate solutions, but it looks to me like the 27 ft disk should be supported off of a "turn table bearing" which has either internal or external gear teeth to allow it to be driven, and a stationary shaft allowed to pass through the center of the bearing which would support item A.
The shaft B is going to be big and require some expensive bearings. If you would provide a better explanation of what you are really trying to accomplish, then you might get some even better suggestions.
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
If you cannot hold A externally, are you allowed to drive against something external?
> An autocollimator or other sensor would detect the angle change and a PID loop driving a galvanometer or moving coil drive would hold A in place. > Another option is to have a rotor on A driving in the opposite direction of B; again, an autocollimator or other sensor would sense motion and either speed up or slow down the rotor to compensate for perturbations from B.
There are a bunch of variations on the above.
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
Either way, if possible you may want to consider putting an rod through A and supporting it on 2 (lighter) bearings in stead of one, this may reduce friction as there will be no rotational moment in the bearing. See added pic.
NX 7.5
Teamcenter 8
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
Add a feedback (light sensor?) between B and a fixed object so the motors change speed as "B" moved w/r to the world reference frame.
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
You can use an off center mass, say on a flywheel or something, that is proportionally controlled by a simple feedback from the bearing between the 2 parts. This way you can tune the P so that it is always perfectly center and not moving.
I have a feeling passive solutions to this problem will lead to errors for sure.
And since you were considering a gyro in the beginning it means you have no problem putting a little motor on it.
Fe (IronX32)
RE: COUNTER WEIGHT
If there is no power available, a heavy weight hanging straight down and rigidly connected to A would be good.
If the bearing seized, A is going to spin no matter what you do unless you install a very low strength shear pin or the like between A and the bearing. You have not said what the consequences are if A does start to rotate.