×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shell & Tube Orientation

Shell & Tube Orientation

Shell & Tube Orientation

(OP)
I have an application for a single pass (both shell side and tube side) heat exchanger.  This ia a low temperature (-70 °C shell, -25 °C tube) application primarily concerned with heat removal resulting from a chemical reactor in a batch process.

I would like to orient the exchanger vertically with tube side flow into the top and out the bottom.  Shell side flow is to be counter-current.  I expect a dT of -2 °C on the tube side and +10 °C on the shell side.

I have been told that horizontal orientation is better than vertical for heat transfer.  This does not make any sense to me.  I'd think the difference between horizontal and vertical should be negligible, and in the case of this application (with the dTs the way they are) vertical might be slightly better.

Anyone with thoughts on this?


thanks

RE: Shell & Tube Orientation

Proj!

I feel gravity is a factor. There may be less contact period if you are allowing fluid to flow from top to bottom. You may end up with valve controling below the heat exchanger.

Regards,

RE: Shell & Tube Orientation

If you have condensation the vertically could be preferred but if its pure liquid/gas then i dont think gravity has an influence on the efficiency (for a shell and tube - some other types of HX may behave differently).
Best Regards

Morten

RE: Shell & Tube Orientation

(OP)
I probably should have mentioned that this is a liquid / liquid application - no phase change.


thanks

RE: Shell & Tube Orientation

selecting between vertical and horizontal S&T-HE is governed by several criteria... e.g. the big HP pre-heaters in a power plant are usually vertical.
What you have to consider is:
1. is foot print area at premium?
2. do you have enough headroom for maintenance if vertical is selected? conversely, is there enough horizontal room for tube bundle removal?
3. is piping arrangemente suitable for either position?
4. Good venting/drainage of shell and tubes is required for optimum performance (no air pockets)... careful on the venting, drainage arrangement of the shell side in vertical arrangement.
HTH
saludos.
a.

RE: Shell & Tube Orientation

Depending on how much sub-cooling you require, vertical condenser (subcoolers) can be advantageous.  They can be fixed with a 'loop seal' on the shell-side outlet which is essentially an upside down U-bend.  This prevents the fluid from draining from the HX at so rapid a rate that it emerges without much subcooling.  You might find the book, "Process Heat Transfer" by D.Q.Kern helpful in this area.

Apart from that, and as long as the flowrates are controlled, there is no real difference in liquid-to-liquid subcoolers.  However, what abeltio mentioned about maintenance is very important.  Particulate deposition favours low areas in a process line and the HX should be accessible for cleaning approx. once a year.  Is it fixed tubesheet or removable bundle?

regards,

melv

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources