×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Prying Action

Prying Action

Prying Action

(OP)
I am working on a project to design a bolt connection for wide flange beam seating on HSS column (cap plate). While checking the prying action on the beam flange I got a result that the minimum required thickness is twice greater than beam flange thickness. There is no room to put in additional bolts to my connection. Would it be okay if I weld a plate to the beam bottom flange to increase the thickness. Plate weld will be only at the connection area not through out the beam length.

RE: Prying Action

post a sketch

RE: Prying Action

The doubler plate may solve the prying problem, but would not help in developing significant moment into the beam.  Vertical stiffeners in the beam would tend to address both issues.

RE: Prying Action

can I ask what this connection is on?

It looks like a crane runway girder.

Anyway, I agree with hokie.

This connection should have a pair of stiffeners. It looks to be an "unframed end" of beam in which case I believe AISC requires stiffeners for rotation anyway.


Rotational Restraint at Support

AISC Specification Section J10.7 requires full-depth stiffeners at the "unframed ends of beams and girders." What does this mean? Would an example be a girder bearing on a column with no beam framing into it at the column?
Answer

Yes, this section addresses situations such as the end of a beam that bears on column cap plate. Unless the column top is restrained, the beam might twist or the web might distort, allowing the bottom flange to move transversely. This creates a dangerous situation, because the column below was designed assuming a pinned-pinned condition with its top is restrained against lateral displacement. If a brace is provided to restrain the top of the column, the beam end is framed. If not, stiffeners can be used as required in Section J10.7. Note that the concern for column stability also exists when girders frame continuously over the top of the column. See Section 2 of the 13th edition AISC Steel Construction Manual for further information.

Brad Davis, Ph.D., S.E.


http://www.modernsteel.com/steelinterchange_details.php?id=819
 

RE: Prying Action

(OP)
Thanks for the responds.
Perhaps I didn't show the stiffeners on my sketch. Per my calculation web crippling exist at support locations and I added a pair of transverse stiffeners to support the web.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources