×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

BLF safety factors with real world problems.

BLF safety factors with real world problems.

BLF safety factors with real world problems.

(OP)
When calculating buckling load factors with FEA programs such as Pro/Mechanica what type of safety factors do you guys use for real world problems? e.g. Thin walled cantilevered beam under static bending loads.

I understand FEA does not consider real world manufacturing inaccuracies etc. Hence the question.

Are there any codes or standards that cover this?

Thanks

RE: BLF safety factors with real world problems.

AS1210 pressure code uses 3 for theoretical elastic buckling and 2 against the lower bound of experimental buckling results. For structural work you could probably reduce this a little but if you know it is prone to buckling then keep it around 3 for those items. I have seen BLF as low as 1.2 to 1.5 used but I think this is best left for conservative hand calculations only.

RE: BLF safety factors with real world problems.

(OP)
Thanks fellow Aussie.

RE: BLF safety factors with real world problems.

It would depend on the industry. In the aircraft industry, where weight is critical, a factor of 1.0 to 1.20 might be used.

The lower factor is more relevant for the short/intermediate column range where plasticity (Johnson part of the Johnson-Euler curve) is often slightly conservative compared to empirical data.

A FEM could account for the real world scenarios (manufacturing tolerances, imperfections, eccentricities, etc.), but only if you tell it to. But because it is not usually practical (nor are the scenarios always easy to quantify), we often just solve the nominal solution and apply a margin of safety based on empirical data.  

Brian
www.espcomposites.com

RE: BLF safety factors with real world problems.

If you are talking about load factors obtained from an Eigenvalue buckling analysis (as against a non linear analysis), you need to remember that these are only the ratio of applied loads to elastic critical loads, and do not consider the yield stress if this gives a capacity less than the elastic critical load.
For structural work this is codified in Eurocode EN1993-1-1 and similar codes. In simplistic terms the buckling load factor is back calculated to give a slenderness ratio which is then applied to the strut curves that include allowances for initial imperfections and residual stresses. There is no one simple additional factor that can be applied and the final design load factor in structural work can often be many times less than that obtained from an Eigenvalue buckling analysis.

RE: BLF safety factors with real world problems.

it shouldn't be a matter of what load to apply to an FEM ... it should be a matter of what load are you designing to ?  what code ? (a/c generally use 1.5)

RE: BLF safety factors with real world problems.

Buckling analysis is performed on top of stress analysis, it has not been suggested it would be used instead.

As you say permissible stress design will give you a slenderness ratio that can be compared to allowables that incorporate allowances. Limit state will use the elastic buckling load factor to calculate a moment amplification factor. Both of which are not useful in numerical analysis and so a suitable BLF must be selected.

I don't know of many structural codes that give BLF for FEA. There aren't many that even cover FEA with allowables for local stresses, and classification of primary and secondary stresses. When modelling a structure in FEA generally the imperfections in material and manufacturing are not modelled or able to be modelled so this must be included in the BLF. Unfortunately a lot of this comes down to engineering judgement without specific design codes.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources