×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

using 18-8 stainless material callout
3

using 18-8 stainless material callout

using 18-8 stainless material callout

(OP)
I sometimes specify using 18-8 stainless as a material callout where an exact SS is not necessary and I want to give the vendor/machinist options for using material in stock, especially for small qty orders. I realize some of the 18-8's  are not as preferred for machining but doable. My logic is if I'm ordering one or two parts why not give the most options for material when possible which the vendor might have in stock as remnants. I understand 18-8 generally applies to 301, 302, 303, 304... any stainless with at least 18% chromium and 8% nickel

This sometimes leads to confusion from vendors with a range of questions from 'which one' to 'can I use 303'...

My question is, is calling out 18-8 material for machined parts bad practice?  

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Your logic makes perfect sense to me.

And you seem to be blessed with vendors who will actually call you to clarify.

Another thing you could do is explicitly list them all.

Material:  Stainless Steel per ASME 301, 302, 303, 304...

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

18-8 is only nominally 18% chromium, that is not a minimum.  I suppose if your application is that non-critical you can specify anything you want.  In general, it is good practice to make material specifications as open as possible as long as it doesn't affect function or safety.  

My biggest problem with "18-8" is that it is not a specification at all.  Everybody knows what it is but how do you prove what is or is not 18-8?  To the best of my knowledge, no standards organization has a precise definition of what is acceptable.

----------------------------------------

The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
 

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

You could also make a note "See PO". I have seen this before for parts like this. Add the material that is agreed upon on the PO.

Chris
SolidWorks 11
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

(OP)

Quote:

My biggest problem with "18-8" is that it is not a specification at all.  Everybody knows what it is but how do you prove what is or is not 18-8?  To the best of my knowledge, no standards organization has a precise definition of what is acceptable.  

I think here-in lies the heart of my problem. Without a proper definition it would be bad practice to use this as a callout, but it was always my understanding that 18-8 is used interchangeably when referring to 300 series stainless steel (having approximately 18% chromium and 8% nickel). It is used often in hardware callouts, why would it not be defined somewhere?

And thank you for clarifying 18-8 is a nominal value, not a minimum. (my underscore was not in vain) :)

 

lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Koda94,

   If you do not care what kind of stainless steel they use, why not just say "STAINLESS STEEL"?  If you insist on maximum corrosion resistance, you can say "STAINLESS STEEL AUSTENITIC".

   I have just released a drawing specifying "STAINLESS STEEL MAGNETIC".  That gives me a ferritic material like 416.  I want it to be magnetic.  I don't need high strength.  

               JHG

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Really hate when someone has to go to second or such documentation to figure out part of the product definition, so I never advocate putting "See PO".  There's too much opportunity for someone (buyers, being evil buggars that they are) to put in something to save money.

List specific grades that are acceptable on the drawing, or the category such as "Any 300-Series St.St."

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services  www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc.  www.tec-ease.com

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Quote:

but it was always my understanding that 18-8 is used interchangeably when referring to 300 series stainless steel (having approximately 18% chromium and 8% nickel). It is used often in hardware callouts, why would it not be defined somewhere?

18-8 is a colloquial specification.

It's fine for tea kettles and frying pans, but shouldn't be used in engineering call-out where what the material is is important.

18-8 is nominal 18% chromium and 8% nickel.  But there is no control at all about what else might be in the mix, or how much of it, and some elements can have undesirable effects if present in more than trace amounts.  

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

(OP)

Quote:

But there is no control at all about what else might be in the mix, or how much of it, and some elements can have undesirable effects if present in more than trace amounts.  

This correlates with dgallop's post. it makes sense that 18-8 might be bad practice to use as a material callout.

Quote:

If you do not care what kind of stainless steel they use, why not just say "STAINLESS STEEL"?  If you insist on maximum corrosion resistance, you can say "STAINLESS STEEL AUSTENITIC".
I think this will be the best solution.

To clarify, I'm not getting called every time. I figured that if my callout is questioned at all I should consider if there is a better way to call it out. It doesn't look like 18-8 is a good choice.  

lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

I did the research at one time to get all the standards for all the materials my company used, and placed those in the notes.  As with the drafting standard itself, any reference to a material should include the national/international standard that defines that material.

Matt Lorono, CSWP
Product Definition Specialist, DS SolidWorks Corp
Personal sites:
Lorono's SolidWorks Resources & SolidWorks Legion

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

MechNorth,
I agree. I'm not a fan of "see PO", but have seen it done.
In today's world it seems that anything goes. Technical minds don't run a lot of engineering companies anymore.

I prefer to indicate the exact material needed.
The material spec should follow.
If you need 18-8, indicate it. If others are OK, indicated them also as "or".

Chris
SolidWorks 11
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

I agree with most here and have often used "300 SERIES STAINLESS" as a callout, leaving it fairly open.

"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
 

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

ctopher,

   See Tips on Designing Cost Effective Machined Parts.

   The point Joe Osborn make is that when you say just "STAINLES STEEL", he selects the cheapest, easiest to fabricate stainless steel he can find.  You both save money.  

   Insist on specific material only when it matters to you.

   This is not just a money saving point.  Once it is understood that you are anal retentive about material, it will be assumed that you are always anal retentive.  It will be understood that the material can be switched when convenient.  The material will be switched when it actually matters to you.

   An advantage to being flexible about specifications is that when you aren't, most people will know that you mean it.   

               JHG

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

drawoh - we used to just say things like 'STAINLESS STEEL' for situations where there was no load on the part, not particular corrosion concerns etc.

However, purchasing were concerned the machine shop might try using some exotic material they had on the shelf and charge us accordingly so now we spec 303 SST for every non critical situation regardless.

I still find it hard to see purchasing's point but there you go.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Quote (drawoh):

Once it is understood that you are anal retentive about material, it will be assumed that you are always anal retentive.
Unfortunately, "material" can be substituted with just about any term.
winky smile

"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
 

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Assuming purchasing did their job and got at least 3 quotes on every job it's hard to see how they could find 3 vendors all trying to gouge you for unobtanium.

----------------------------------------

The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
 

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Got rid of the unicorns, too impractical.  We have flying cars now.

----------------------------------------

The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
 

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Here's where they dgallup's company sent their now surplus unicorn herds:

http://www.thinkgeek.com/caffeine/wacky-edibles/e5a7/?srp=1

And on a slightly more serious note - the machining cost savings of 303 are more often than not offset by the typically cheaper cost (because I guess so much more of it is used) of 304/304L stock.  I usually make the generic stainless callout read "any AISI/SAE type 3xx", or sometimes use "Any UNS S30xxx alloy steel".

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Oooo, oooo! Soylent Green is back in stock!

Technically, the glass is always  full.

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Just remember, UNS stands for Unicorn Numbering System.

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

(OP)

Quote (btrueblood):

I usually make the generic stainless callout read "any AISI/SAE type 3xx", or sometimes use "Any UNS S30xxx alloy steel".
bingo. I think this is what eluded my imagination in my quest for a correct way to specify a generic stainless callout. Sometimes my imagination gets stuck on a path but is actually tunnel vision...

I still have some curiosity about the 18-8 specification, if they can spec hardware out of it, then what is its standard? ...as mentioned prior, a standard does not exist? If its just simply defined as any 300 series that fits the 18-8 rule then technically it should not create confusion on a drawing!  

a side note about price gouging on a generic material callout, any shop that would actually charge for the most expensive actual material remnant is not building a good customer relationship in my book. This may come down to semantics, but if I specify a generic material, I'm assuming the cheapest of the set quoted and used... or rather a small chunk of [reasonably] more expensive remnant is probably cheaper to use than ordering a blank new stock of cheaper grade, especially for a one off small part order. If they want to try me for some 3XX series unobtanium I'll find a new shop.

thanks everyone for the posts...  

lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

All 300 series stainless is 18-8

Not all 18-8 stainless is 300 series.

I routinely reject the use of 18-8 hardware when 304 is specified.  

RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout

Well, I bought this up at my DFMA training today.  Explained what we used to do, what purchasing told us to do and asked from a DFMA point of view what his view was.

Like most of my targeted questions he waffled a bit and was fairly non committal.  He did come up with the obvious 'list more than one material' chest nut.

However, our manufacturing engineering manager did chime in quite strongly that the phone calls they'd get from vendors questioning what grad of SST/Al to use would out weigh any benefits.

I'd say more but I'm so underwhelmed by the whole training that I'm finding it hard to care.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources