using 18-8 stainless material callout
using 18-8 stainless material callout
(OP)
I sometimes specify using 18-8 stainless as a material callout where an exact SS is not necessary and I want to give the vendor/machinist options for using material in stock, especially for small qty orders. I realize some of the 18-8's are not as preferred for machining but doable. My logic is if I'm ordering one or two parts why not give the most options for material when possible which the vendor might have in stock as remnants. I understand 18-8 generally applies to 301, 302, 303, 304... any stainless with at least 18% chromium and 8% nickel
This sometimes leads to confusion from vendors with a range of questions from 'which one' to 'can I use 303'...
My question is, is calling out 18-8 material for machined parts bad practice?
This sometimes leads to confusion from vendors with a range of questions from 'which one' to 'can I use 303'...
My question is, is calling out 18-8 material for machined parts bad practice?





RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
And you seem to be blessed with vendors who will actually call you to clarify.
Another thing you could do is explicitly list them all.
Material: Stainless Steel per ASME 301, 302, 303, 304...
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
My biggest problem with "18-8" is that it is not a specification at all. Everybody knows what it is but how do you prove what is or is not 18-8? To the best of my knowledge, no standards organization has a precise definition of what is acceptable.
----------------------------------------
The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
Chris
SolidWorks 11
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
I think here-in lies the heart of my problem. Without a proper definition it would be bad practice to use this as a callout, but it was always my understanding that 18-8 is used interchangeably when referring to 300 series stainless steel (having approximately 18% chromium and 8% nickel). It is used often in hardware callouts, why would it not be defined somewhere?
And thank you for clarifying 18-8 is a nominal value, not a minimum. (my underscore was not in vain) :)
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
If you do not care what kind of stainless steel they use, why not just say "STAINLESS STEEL"? If you insist on maximum corrosion resistance, you can say "STAINLESS STEEL AUSTENITIC".
I have just released a drawing specifying "STAINLESS STEEL MAGNETIC". That gives me a ferritic material like 416. I want it to be magnetic. I don't need high strength.
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
List specific grades that are acceptable on the drawing, or the category such as "Any 300-Series St.St."
Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services www.profileservices.ca
TecEase, Inc. www.tec-ease.com
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
18-8 is a colloquial specification.
It's fine for tea kettles and frying pans, but shouldn't be used in engineering call-out where what the material is is important.
18-8 is nominal 18% chromium and 8% nickel. But there is no control at all about what else might be in the mix, or how much of it, and some elements can have undesirable effects if present in more than trace amounts.
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
This correlates with dgallop's post. it makes sense that 18-8 might be bad practice to use as a material callout.
I think this will be the best solution.
To clarify, I'm not getting called every time. I figured that if my callout is questioned at all I should consider if there is a better way to call it out. It doesn't look like 18-8 is a good choice.
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
Matt Lorono, CSWP
Product Definition Specialist, DS SolidWorks Corp
Personal sites:
Lorono's SolidWorks Resources & SolidWorks Legion
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
I agree. I'm not a fan of "see PO", but have seen it done.
In today's world it seems that anything goes. Technical minds don't run a lot of engineering companies anymore.
I prefer to indicate the exact material needed.
The material spec should follow.
If you need 18-8, indicate it. If others are OK, indicated them also as "or".
Chris
SolidWorks 11
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
See Tips on Designing Cost Effective Machined Parts.
The point Joe Osborn make is that when you say just "STAINLES STEEL", he selects the cheapest, easiest to fabricate stainless steel he can find. You both save money.
Insist on specific material only when it matters to you.
This is not just a money saving point. Once it is understood that you are anal retentive about material, it will be assumed that you are always anal retentive. It will be understood that the material can be switched when convenient. The material will be switched when it actually matters to you.
An advantage to being flexible about specifications is that when you aren't, most people will know that you mean it.
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
However, purchasing were concerned the machine shop might try using some exotic material they had on the shelf and charge us accordingly so now we spec 303 SST for every non critical situation regardless.
I still find it hard to see purchasing's point but there you go.
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
----------------------------------------
The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
----------------------------------------
The Help for this program was created in Windows Help format, which depends on a feature that isn't included in this version of Windows.
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
http://ww
And on a slightly more serious note - the machining cost savings of 303 are more often than not offset by the typically cheaper cost (because I guess so much more of it is used) of 304/304L stock. I usually make the generic stainless callout read "any AISI/SAE type 3xx", or sometimes use "Any UNS S30xxx alloy steel".
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
Technically, the glass is always full.
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
I still have some curiosity about the 18-8 specification, if they can spec hardware out of it, then what is its standard? ...as mentioned prior, a standard does not exist? If its just simply defined as any 300 series that fits the 18-8 rule then technically it should not create confusion on a drawing!
a side note about price gouging on a generic material callout, any shop that would actually charge for the most expensive actual material remnant is not building a good customer relationship in my book. This may come down to semantics, but if I specify a generic material, I'm assuming the cheapest of the set quoted and used... or rather a small chunk of [reasonably] more expensive remnant is probably cheaper to use than ordering a blank new stock of cheaper grade, especially for a one off small part order. If they want to try me for some 3XX series unobtanium I'll find a new shop.
thanks everyone for the posts...
lightweight, cheap, strong... pick 2
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
Not all 18-8 stainless is 300 series.
I routinely reject the use of 18-8 hardware when 304 is specified.
RE: using 18-8 stainless material callout
Like most of my targeted questions he waffled a bit and was fairly non committal. He did come up with the obvious 'list more than one material' chest nut.
However, our manufacturing engineering manager did chime in quite strongly that the phone calls they'd get from vendors questioning what grad of SST/Al to use would out weigh any benefits.
I'd say more but I'm so underwhelmed by the whole training that I'm finding it hard to care.
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?