×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Industry standard on pipeline crossing
4

Industry standard on pipeline crossing

Industry standard on pipeline crossing

(OP)
Hi all,

what API or other documents (or other resources) can I consult to find industry standards on pipeline crossings. I'm more interested in finding useful information about pipeline crossing for buried (and may be above ground) pipelines.

There was an incident where a still pipeline was installed below an already existing fiber glass salt water line and the filling in between them was not compact enough, afte a few months, the soil inbetween them gave way and the fiber glass line deflected (sagged) to the point where it failed and caused a release. We are currently using sand bags inbtween the top and bottom lines, does any one have any recommendation or experience with that/

Thanks for your help.

As much as possible, do it right the first time...

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

Every answer to this question has a lot of hair on it.  There is limited guidance in the DOT, but beyond that it is pretty much up to the owners of the line.  In fact, it is usually up to the owner of the new line because the owner of the old line too often doesn't show up to a crossing.

If I'm crossing fiberglass, I try to preferentially go over it, but that isn't always possible.  A stack of sandbags between the new pipe and the old pipe is a terrible answer because the bags tend to flow under compressive forces over time.  I found that out in a situation similar to the one you described, except instead of a "leak" I ended up with a guillotine fracture that got really exciting.  If you've going to use sandbags, use a LOT of them.  Start building up on the bottom of the new ditch and stack them to the ditch walls all the way to the fiberglass (maximize the containment so they can't flow).  

I've thought about cutting about 20 ft of the next size HDPE in half laterally and using it as a saddle, but that requires an increase in the disturbed soil under the fiberglass and probably hurts more than it helps.

David

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

engr2GW (Petroleum)

LOOK FOR SAUDI ARAMCO STANDARD PIPELINE ROAD CROSSING & NACE

BEEN THEIR DID THAT 1977  

L S THILL

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

The standard you are looking for is API-1102, "Recommended practice for liquid petroleum pipelines crossing railroads and highways"

1.) Sand bags is a common method.  Sand-cement bags, even better.
2.) Use a half-casing, or full casing, Precast Concrete Pipe, installed as an arch above the sandbags around your pipe, sand bag over that and continue up and around the crossed pipe.
In lieu of PCP, just a concrete load-bearing slab.
3.) If it's a very large pipeline you're going under, dig a deeper pit farther away on both sides and thrust bore with pleanty of clearance (1.5 to 2 m) underneath.

 

From "BigInch's Extremely simple theory of everything."

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

Road and railway crossings are a different issue.  I believe that the OP is asking about pipelines crossing pipelines.  I assumed he was talking about gas, but that might just be my bias (I've never used fiberglass for liquids).

David

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

(OP)
Thanks for all your posts, and yes, I was talking about pipeline crossing pipeline, especially where the second pipeline will be underneath the first one.

Thanks.

As much as possible, do it right the first time...

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

Pipeline crossing, or crossing pipeline??
Doesn't matter much.  You need to support what's above with what's below without breaking either one of them.

From "BigInch's Extremely simple theory of everything."

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

The industry standard is remove any lose and unsuitable materials in the work area, stack sand-cement bags (brick laying fashion) then place well compacted granular fill.  If you do it properly, 999/1000 you will never have to touch it again.

zdas, You never can go over, because the first pipeline didn't know you were coming and they took the minimum trench depth.  You should have reserved your space in advance.  I have a reservation system for pipeline over crossings already in place.  Anywhere you want in the world, held in reserve until you decide to use it, $100.00 ... Only.

From "BigInch's Extremely simple theory of everything."

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

you can nearly always go over gravity lines (sewers) which are often very deep. sometimes over waterlines and rarely over gas lines which seem to be installed in the worst possible locations...

never heard of the sandbag method, that must be only for the petroleum pipeline industry.

 

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

If the "above" pipe is existing and well anchored (or supported) then why would you have a problem??

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

(OP)
Thanks everyone,
@ Biginch;
if youre going to backfill with compacted granular, my question is, if it going to be easy to re-excavate incase of a repair, or any other reason why one would need to go back there?
thanks.

As much as possible, do it right the first time...

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

mike

when going under an existing pipe, you generally must remove the supporting soil from under it and you may have limited information on it's design or construction. you probably are not going to do a pipe stress analysis of the existing pipe. so to protect it you must support it as recommended by the owner of the pipe or in a better manner so that you may rest easy at night that it is well supported should the new trench backfill you placed beneath it begin to settle or should the new pipe below it leak and saturate the soil or create a void.

a common way is to place permanent supports under the existing pipe to hold it. These are often reinforced concrete.

If it appears weak, Possibly replace part of the top pipe with new, stronger pipe.  

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

(OP)
@cvg;

that's new to me "placing a permanent support under the existing pipe to hold it". Do you think that in the event of revisiting the bell hole for a repair, etc, that the permanent structure will be a problem since it'll be directly connected to the buried pipe.

and by re-inforced concrete, do yo mean like a pillar like structure from the base of the ditch to the base of the pipe as a support between the pipe and the void?
Thank you.

As much as possible, do it right the first time...

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

see attached details for some standard methods of pipe supports plus link below to Los Angeles standard detail of a concrete "blanket" which is useful for crossing over an existing pipe

bond breaker such as plastic can be used so that it is not "directly connected", but yes, any type of concrete placed into the trench might cause issues for long term O&M of both pipes. Thats why it's best not to cross anything...

http://eng.lacity.org/techdocs/stdplans/s-200/s255-1.pdf

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

(OP)
Thanks everyone!

As much as possible, do it right the first time...

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

Not cross anything.  There's an idea.  

Actually petroleum & gas pipeline operating companies do require someone that crosses their pipelines to apply for their permission, for which if granted, after a stress analysis for temporary loss of support etc., they will send out a supervisor to view the work in progress and make sure it is done in accordance with the approved permit drawing.  On occasion I have done a lowering the line analysis, not for a pipeline crossing over, but usually for a road that was going through which of course had to go over the top.

Offshore it is impractical to go under an existing pipeline, so over crossings are the only way.  A pyramid structure of sand-cement bags is stacked on top of the existing mudline and the new pipeline is encased in the sand-cement bags,  and/or an inflatable bag (for cement to be pumped down into the bag as filler) is then mattressed over the top as well.

From "BigInch's Extremely simple theory of everything."

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

Require???  I don't know of a single state where you can get exclusive ROW from the Feds or State (ROW negotiations on private land is whatever you can negotiate).  I've had pipeline companies tell me that I "couldn't" cross them.  My response is always "I'm going to cross, you can participate in the analysis or not".  Or they would say that I "have" to go under them by at least 4 ft.  My response to that is "I don't really 'have' to do much of anything, I'll go under or over depending on where your pipe is and where my pipe is at that point.  I'll try to get as much clearance as makes sense, but I'm not going to blast".  I hate it when companies think that their policy automatically applies to the industry.

The pipeline owner really cannot prevent someone from crossing them.  Any that try always fail, and then find themselves eventually coming hat in hand to someone that they tried to bully to ask their "permission" to cross them.  The companies that have tried to jack me around always get the response "no, you can't cross me".  Then I watch them squirm and stir around and finally find out that I didn't have any authority over where their pipe went.

David

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

that being said, standard of care is to work with the other pipeline owner and try to equal or exceed their requirements if possible. keeps the lawyers at bay...

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

I will always work with someone who says "let's see how we can do this best".  I don't ever work with people who say "[my way] is the only way that will be considered".  

When I was operating a gathering system I had zero fear of lawyers--my company got sued by someone somewhere in the world every workday of the year.  We had a pre-printed response the "I'm going to sue you", it was the address of our attorney so the paperwork could be served properly.

David

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

While there are certainly other responsible organizations and references etc. as mentioned in earlier responses, the ASCE "Pipeline Crossings Technical Committee" was one of the charter committees of the Pipeline Division when it was formed in 1956. I believe there have also been a great many papers presented in many ASCE venues, e.g. beginning in the "Transportation Journal" with regards to many sorts of pipeline crossings in the many years since. While not saying same will answer your specific questions, in 1996 this committee also presented in Burlington, Vt a new ASCE MOP No. 89, "Pipeline Crossings", that I believe addresses to at least some extent many different aspects of various types of crossings with many rather detailed generic considerations, and includes also at least a brief section dealing further specifically with "Protection of Adjacent Pipelines and Structures". I guess some provisions for such have been discussed on or referenced in this thread already, and some have not

While I don't guess I know enough more about this subject to get any further up on any soapbox (that surely I would not want to do -- gee I liked zdas's characterization!), I will only say it appears present designers and constructors may be sort of victimized in many cases by what has come before, e.g. in prior choice of weak pipe materials etc. After all, who "would have thunk" it may ever be necessary to cross pipelines in the future, and what the value of a strong and/or also flexibly joined existing system that can tolerate some subsequent movement or settlement without over-stressing might be when that is necessary??  
If, indeed "when" (in much of the real world (as has already been intimated) it is necessary to cross existing pipelines, it can be argued it may be virtually impossible in many practical circumstances to cross an existing pipeline or structure underground without at least some effect on the support of, and concomitant three-dimensional effects, on one or the other.     

 

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

Might work that way in the wild, wild west, but most civilized places in the world, ya can't do it thataway unless you like the inside of a jail cell.

From "BigInch's Extremely simple theory of everything."

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

I gotta say I like the wild wild west, civilized places don't sound like much fun.

David

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

LoL.

I can just hear John Wayne:  "Well, pardner, do you want to cross my line or don't ya?"

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

OK, then maybe it's the other extreme here.  If you try an unauthorized crossing around these parts, the natioinal guard's industrial defense forces shoot first and ask questions ... never.

From "BigInch's Extremely simple theory of everything."

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

Actually it's better yet not to even shoot pictures.

From "BigInch's Extremely simple theory of everything."

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

...to add a couple other notable quotes from the past,

"What we have here is a failure to communicate."  

( I of course didn't say the new "crosser" would win any such arguments, just adding to the obvious that an initially chosen installed weaker pipeline had apparently, and perhaps not surprisingly considering the required over-excavation and structural weakness and unequal three-dimensional strength of such pipe, been compromised per the OP by the crossing that was apparently required to be close underneath.)

As to the new tag line of our most well-known responder, someone who can simplify or has enough knowledge and experience to make very complicated issues at least somewhat understandable for most of us admittedly more unwashed masses is indeed invaluable.

RE: Industry standard on pipeline crossing

First break it down to extremely simple components and find the similarities.  There's always more than the differences.

These days it seems a separate procedure is needed to paint something red, or paint the same thing green.

From "BigInch's Extremely simple theory of everything."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources