×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

(OP)
I have a 5-story condo with reinforced CMU bearing walls and hollow-core plank floors. The bearing wall is 72' long, bays are 32' wide, floor-floor is 12'. IBC 2009 / ASCE 7-05

1. Can I use the entire length of the wall to figure At? If so, At=72(5x32)=11,520 sf.  I used Kll=2. This allows for the maximum reduction down to L=0.4Lo. Or you could argue that the wall is a one-way slab and the width is limited to 1.5 x the floor-floor height. Then At=18(5x32)=2,880 sf. Now, L=0.448Lo. Your interpretation?

2. Even though I can't get a reduction of the snow load on the roof, I used the roof area as part of the tributary area being supported by the wall and footing. Does this make sense?

The strip footing load is getting very large.  I think piles and a grade beam would not work for this project for budget reasons.

RE: Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

1.  ASCE 7's commentary doesn't address this that I can see but your use of the 1.5 x span (i.e. 1.5 x wall height) to get the width of the floor participating in the footing load sounds right.

2.  No - you don't use the roof area to reduce floor live loads.

 

RE: Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

I do not include roof area in the LL reduction calculation. In my area snow controls the roof framing, and the load combinations themselves take care of the live and snow loads not being present at the same time.

I also wouldn't use the full length of the wall.  At most I would only a length equal to how far the wall could clear span without a footing, but would more likely just use a typical bay width

RE: Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

See ASCE 7-05 section 4.8.5 that states: "The tributary area, AT ,
for one-way slabs shall not exceed an area defined by the slab
span times a width normal to the span of 1.5 times the slab span."

RE: Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

@SteveGregory- This is how we incorporate reduction in LL in the design of the exterior load bearing masonry walls with openings. (typical scenario in condos)
Let us consider masonry pier 2'-8" wide with 4'-0" wide openings on each side. For simplicity assume the openings align on all the floors. Tributary area for masonry pier / floor = 6'-8" x (32' / 2) = 107 sft.  AT = 4(floors) x 107 = 428 sft.
KLL for exterior column without cantilever slabs = 4.
AL = KLL x AT = 4 X 428 = 1712 sft.
L = 0.61 Lo.   

RE: Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

(OP)
DST,
This is similar to what I have on the exterior walls. There are garage door openings with piers.

However, the interior walls have long solid sections. Do you use KLL=2 [Ai/At similar to a beam] and use full length of the wall for AT or use 1.5 times the flr-flr height span of the wall for the AT length?

Everyone,
This may be a little picky. Roof live load is a separate load from roof snow load. Roof live load is reducible but snow is not. You could argue that the roof area could be used in the total tributary area calculation for AT even though snow controls and you take no reduction on the roof. Your thoughts?

RE: Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

I've always treated the roof live load reduction as a separate statistical calc from the floor live load reduction.  So the AT of the roof is different from that of the floors.

RE: Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

(OP)
Jae,
I am not calculating the AT for the design of the roof members. I am calculating the AT for the bearing wall and footing that supports all of the floors and the roof.
 

RE: Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

Roof live loads are a different load case than floor live load (Lr instead of just L).  The load combinations in ASCE7 do not apply full floor live and full roof live in the same combination.  I do not (and would not) mix tributary areas from multiple load cases to determine your LL reduction

RE: Live Load Reduction for Bearing Wall & Strip Footing

@SteveGregory - For interior walls we use KLL = 2 - similar to beams. For calculating AT we typically use floor to floor height but not more than 10 feet. This is to accommodate any openings in the future, if required. (we had to accommodate relocated doors in the cellar on few occasions)
But no matter what the calculations show, we always design walls on the lower storys for the following minimum live loads.
Exterior loadbearing walls  L = 0.60 Lo
Interior loadbearing walls  L = 0.50 Lo

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources