×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

(OP)
Hi there,
I trust you all are having a good start to the new year!

As a design engineer, I continuously have to look at new ways of designing components or products.

I obviously have to take cost, weight, material, corrosion, reliability, performance etc. into account. I am familiar with using a Weighted Design Matrix. Where all the options are listed and scored based on their affect on the relevant criteria. The option with the best score is the design that we use.

Now I am finding this unreliable, and I would like to know whether you have any process of making calculated decisions for designs?

Any feedback would be great!

Laurence

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

why unreliable ? could you give an exmaple ?

the problem (and strength) of the matrix method is that you need to capture all the relevant dimensions and weight them correctly.

another problem is that over time weights will change and dimensions will probably change.

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

(OP)
Hi,

Well yes, part of the problem is that weighing each of the criteria like reliability, corrosion etc are all user inputs and therefore manipulated. Also when scoring each concept, the scores are related to the designers existing knowledge or lack thereof. It is also possible that the designer is biased towards one concept - this renders the entire process pointless.

L
 

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

it does, doesn't it !

in the bad old days we'd have one guy making the decisions, and his judgment determined the success/failure of the project.  and he knew this (ie his accountability).

today we have committees and processes, and no accountability ...

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

A camel was just a horse designed by committee - probably a dozen or so engineers!!  Like me

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

You may be able to find some kind of reference for some factors, for instance for serious FME(C)A analysis there are data bases with reliability figure for standard component types etc.  However even then they'll be generalizations.

Unless the people filling the matrix are appropriately experienced/knowledgeable about the various factors you don't stand any chance.  Even if knowledgeable it's still subject to manipulation as both of you mention - be it intentional or subconscious.

Remember the table still operates on the GIGO principle.

The Camel is not really a fair analogy, while it may not have the aesthetic sensibilities of a thoroughbred, the camel is incredibly well designed for its task.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

>>>A camel was just a horse designed by committee <<<

It's a fun old saw, but it's completely wrong.

A camel is spectacularly well-designed for its native environment.
... which is very different from the horse's native range.  
Any similarity between the animals is either coincidental, or a response to some common evolutionary pressure.


Speaking of which, Laurence, you now have an opportunity to evolve your product, whatever it is, by going back through its accumulated history of design changes, and coming to an understanding of how each change was or was not an effective or appropriate response to evolutionary pressure.

Pay particular attention to major changes or sets of changes; often enough, you will find that part of the 'old' way was a better solution than a feature that was adopted mostly because it was 'new', and because there was some problem with the old version.  Very rarely does the perpetrator of a major design change take the trouble to measure how, or whether, the change was actually effective.

But now you have, or can derive, data specific to both old and new versions.  Maybe you even have better ways to measure the performance parameters that are actually important.

Take the time.  Do the math.  It usually leads to a whole new level of understanding.


 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

i don't think the camel adage is meant to cast dispersions on the camel itself, i'm sure it is a truly noble creature and another expact of nature designing animals to fit niches (if they don't, they die off).

i think the adage is a comment about designing a horse, and i think you have to admit a camel is a pretty dam'd ugly horse !

and, yes, i know this is all tongue in cheek ...

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

Rb1957 hit the nail on the head.  Isn't democracy and design by committee a wonderful thing, nobody has to be responsible for anything.  In the good old days, a good design engineer, manufacturing engineer and/or lead designer did the matrix thing in their heads, whatever their biases and knowledge and experience level, etc.  Hopefully, they got together and compared their notes and the boss made a decision based on the sum of that knowledge.  The more formal matrix has the potential of being somewhat less biased by one person or element or another, but now the full time job becomes continuously monitoring and adjusting the multiplier factors, based on real good experience of all of the factors, and not being biased as you do this, and it probably should still involve the same committee as above.  That's your job in making the matrix work for you.

The problem as I see it today (and this is an older guy's perspective, maybe more experienced and knowledgeable about some things ) is that we have way to many inexperienced people doing way to many independent little parts of the total, with insufficient guidance or knowledge of the whole machine; then this is all thrown in a blender and out pops the finished part.  Actually, the camel is not a bad horse, particularly in the desert where water is in short supply and their larger hoofs deal better with the dry sand and poor footing.  That design committee didn't do too bad a job.  But today, we have inexperience people using CAD who really couldn't do drafting otherwise.  It must be right if you can do it in CAD, right?  No knowledge of the real facts required.  We have inexperience people using modeling software and FEM and FEA who couldn't take a first shot at a simple beam design without this software.  They don't even know that they are modeling it wrong, after all the program spit out results to 12 signif. places, that must be really really right.  Then many companies have nobody with the knowledge, experience and overview ability to guide this whole process.

This is a fundamental problem (flaw) with the direction engineering and design is going these days, and I don't think there is a big enough column (definable element) in your matrix, or enough multipliers and adjustment factors to account for this deficiency/problem.  All of these new tools and methods have the potential of being improvements in the way we do things, and the way we can finesse designs and analyses today, but we are not combining and using them correctly.  They will not take the place of real experience and product knowledge, not in my lifetime, and companies are making a big mistake thinking otherwise.

 

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

Yes - it was meant to be an adage confirming what DHENGR so eloquently put into words..

When I run into this type of situation, I run it by a few good engineers and a few good field people - they are the ones that are going use it, install it, rely on it.

If that all goes well - then we consider putting it into play.  Obviously ROI now becomes involved and the bean counters have to buy off on it.

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

I take back the nice things I said about Rb1957 in my earlier post, after the way he has disparaged the elegant 'slightly humpy, big footed, desert horse.'   smile

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

I am not sure you are getting the part where you have to find folks who know what they are doing.  

Data never tells the whole story.  It just can't.  You need input from folks who have been there and done it.

Last month I received a request for a quote for a piece of tungsten carbide that was to be 12" x 12" x 0.5".  It was to be used as a skid plate on a flying vehicle.  Tungsten carbide is often used as a wear plate so it made sense.

However tungsten carbide is very weak in some ways.  With careful and expensive grinding of a much larger part you might be able to grind down to the desired dimensions.  However the betting here was about 50:50 on whether it would snap under its own weight if you picked it up by a corner.

It would definitely shatter under any sort of impact.        

I did the engineering team a favor and sold them an STB (Standard tooling blank) for $20 and told them to experiment with it.   Specifically clamp one end in a vise then hit it.

When you see something like a TRS (Transverse Rupture Strength) of 500,000 PSI, it looks really strong.  You have to have somebody who knows what it means.   

If I had been more clever I could have tried for an R&D contract to produce the part.   One of those low ball deals where you make a fortune by charging for every change.  (You need somebody smart enough to keep you out of those.)  I hate those.  I have been in too many accidentally.
 

Thomas J. Walz
Carbide Processors, Inc.
www.carbideprocessors.com

Good engineering starts with a Grainger Catalog.    

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

How many people really use these matrixs?

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

tom, how much money did you cost your company ?

dhengr, i called it "a truly noble creature" ... geez, what more do you want ? my membership card to the "camel lovers assoc." ? ;)
  

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

I just love camel hooves.

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

The only real value in these "Weighted Design Matrix" type analyses is to fool management into thinking you know what you doing.  The criteria and factors can be manipulated to get any answer you want.  See the above comments about using experience to guide design decisions.

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

@mike, hooves or toes ?

@SWC, i don't think i need to fool mgmt that i know what i'm doing, i think i have to fool them that they know what they're doing.

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

Right - TOES!!!

Just too beautiful!!!

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

rb1957

I don't know.  I got $20 for a piece of carbide that was just lying around.   

Yes, I did consider the opportunity for profit.  

It felt like one of those things that was going to be a lot of time and trouble and end up nowhere.  

It reminds me of a question I got from a banker once.  "Now all this R&D you are doing, is that going to pay off?"

I am 65 years old and I lost an awful lot of net worth since 2007.  Had to drop pretty near everything, including, my salary and all R&D to survive.  Things are getting better but they are still really uncertain.  I have learned to be very cautious with all my resources.  I don't think their request was possible.  I really want to work on things that will be successful, ongoing product lines.  

Because I own the place I can use ethics and morals in the decision making process.   

I really miss R&D.  It is such an incredible rush when something works.  Sometimes I just keep running the experiment over and over because it is so much fun to see it work.     

 

Thomas J. Walz
Carbide Processors, Inc.
www.carbideprocessors.com

Good engineering starts with a Grainger Catalog.    

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

tom,

hear your pain, brother.

i read your post as though to sold them a piece of tool steel that'd work for them (rather than a fabulously (??) expensive piece of carbide plate, that they'd asked for but probably wouldn't've worked)

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

(OP)
Yep it is a lot of extra work, I think I am just cautious of forgetting to take something into account...

Thanks

RE: Part Concept Selection and Decision Process

The main purpose of these formal matrix-like thingies is that it encourages you to identify what information you DON'T have.

Probably an experienced engineer can see how to fiddle the weighting factors to get the answer he wants (yes I might have done this once or twice), but at least he can see how blatantly he's had to rig things to get the right answer.

Most often when looking at one of these and the wrong solution pops up, it is because I've forgotten a complete line item.

Same in FMEAs. The bit of paper isn't the real value, it is being encouraged to think about what is going on that is the important bit.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies  http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources