Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login




Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

mechengr221 (Mechanical) (OP)
22 Dec 11 13:16
Hello

My Client is expecting mechanical damages on the internal surface of vessel shell (suction drum) which is in service. We are required to prepare for repairing unexpected vessel shell damages during upcoming plant shutdown. The vessel shell material is SA 516 Gr.70N, shell thickness is 71mm, design MDMT is -37 deg. C & service is non-lethal. The vessel was originally PWHT'd per ASME Sec. VIII Div.1 (due to weld deposit thickness in excess of 38mm). Impact testing is also required.

We were required by the Client to follow the stringent requirements of NB-23 & API 510 while repairing the vessel. Both NB-23 & API 510 call for alternative welding method, viz. controlled deposition method, when PWHT & imapct test are required by the original code of construction. However, we proposed WPS for repair using normal welding technique instead of temper bead welding (TBW) method with the following justifications:

1. Repair depths are not expected to be more than 38mm.
2. Weld build up can be carried out by ordinary welding technique instead of TBW method since PWHT is not required until 38mm weld deposit thickness as per ASME Sec. VIII Sec.1 (UCS-56). Both repair codes (NB-23 / API 510) refer to original code of construction for PWHT requirements.

Kindly confirm if our justifications are valid for repair welding without TBW method applying NB-23 / API 510 stringent requirements. Note that R-stamp is also required after repair.

Regards

mechengr221
metengr (Materials)
22 Dec 11 13:47
What are you going to do with impact testing under original code of construction requirements? If the vessel was originally manufactured with impact qualification, you cannot simply use a conventional welding procedure for this repair without impact qualification.

If the reapir does not require PWHT because of nominal thickness exemptions, you can use a WPS that has been qualified with impact testing.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close