Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...If there has ever been a justification needed for access to the net during working hours, just referring to this site should suffice. Fantastic!..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
kornbrot (Structural)
30 Nov 11 7:08
hello,
i am trying to model a beam that is (example values):
'1 pris yd 1 zd 1' at one end and
'1 pris yd 2 zd 1' at the other.
is this possible or am i wasting my time?
regards,
kornbrot
kornbrot (Structural)
30 Nov 11 7:11
can't fint a edit button so i'll do it this way:

PS: i'm using staad 2005 if this makes any difference
SethGuthrie (Civil/Environmental)
30 Nov 11 13:09
I think you are just looking to use the Tapered Member specification. Check the help contents (Index - Tapered) for details. While the tapered member specification is often used with "I" shaped sections it can also work for rectangular shapes.
 
kornbrot (Structural)
1 Dec 11 4:31
i have worked with the tapered member specifications, but have only managed to create trapeze shaped beams. i am looking to model a beam with different cross section areas at the start and end node...
regards,
kornbrot
edward1 (Geotechnical)
1 Dec 11 14:14
I have modelled several bridges with haunches at abutments and at piers. I put enough nodes in the model so I would have the members no longer than 1 foot. I would get the average depth of each member and use PRIS YD ZD for that property. That works well for modelling bridges.
SethGuthrie (Civil/Environmental)
1 Dec 11 14:17
I agree, modeling a series of short members is always a good solution. Using the Tapered I shape (with no flanges) is maybe a little easier, but it's limited to a tapering of the depth only, where both dimensions are changing, the segmented member approach is best.
kornbrot (Structural)
2 Dec 11 3:51
as i have got more then 150 beams i need o model i would rather refrain from modeling them all in small sections as this would significantly increase the number of elements in the model. i will try playing with the tapered i shape some more, but it doesnt seem to do what i need.
regards,
kornbrot

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close