×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Single Story Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces (ASCE7-05)

Single Story Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces (ASCE7-05)

Single Story Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces (ASCE7-05)

(OP)
I have a single story Manufactured container with dimensions of ~60x15.  There are no interior shear walls.  Seismic controls the design.  The container needs fire rating so there is plenty of heavy gypsum on the roof and walls (shear wall is gypsum on cold-formed framing).  However, the floor has the majority of the seismic weight because 25% of the floor 500 psf live load is assumed as storage (12.7.2(1)), and an assumed 15% of total container dead load for permanent equipment load.

Questions:

1.)  Do I need to distributed the loads vertically per 12.8.3 since this is a single story building on grade?  I normally do (perhaps conservatively) by assuming (3) levels: midpoint of floor, midpoint of walls, and midpoint of roof.  I have reviewed other engineers' work of single story buildings on grade where the distribution was accomplished by multiplying the weight of each "level" by Cs.  Per the P.E. in our office, the distribution of section 12.8.3 is supposed to be done even for single story buildings.

2.)  If the building were put on concrete piers, would this change the answer above?

The large mass of the floor is making my shear wall forces unmanageable if vertical distribution is done per section 12.8.3.

Juston Fluckey, E.I.
Engineering Consultant

RE: Single Story Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces (ASCE7-05)

Normally, the floor of a single story structure does not come into play in the seismic force distribution, only the roof structure weight, and weight of the walls below the roof level.

As to if the placement of the structure on piers would affect this, if the piers were short, 2 feet or less in height, I would ignore the force from the floor unless it was extremely heavy in relation to the roof and wall loads, but any higher, I would include the floor force too, however, I would not redistribute to the roof.  I think that would be an unnecessary overkill.

What are your relative weights?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

 

RE: Single Story Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces (ASCE7-05)

(OP)
The seismic weights are:

Roof: 14.93 kip @ 8.97'
Sidewalls: 21.58 kip @ 4.73'
Endwalls: 5.02 kip @4.73'
Floor: 138.32 kip @ 0.25'

So, this is only for vertical distribution?  You would still use the floor mass in the base shear calculation?  I would set the weight of the floor to zero to determine the Cvx values at each level.  Then multiple the base shear (minus floor weight).  So my base shear would be Cs*(Wroof + Wwalls + Wfloor) and my vertical distribution would be Cvx*Cs*(Wroof + Wwalls)?

Juston Fluckey, E.I.
Engineering Consultant

RE: Single Story Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces (ASCE7-05)

I have never heard of taking slab-on-grade loads and throwing them up to the roof for seismic design.  That is crazy.

The wall weights - yes - they get included in the seismic mass.  But not the slab-on-grade nor the materials resting on that slab.

The mass of the floor level perhaps does get involved in the base shear of the entire system at the ground level (i.e. sliding and footing designs for lateral forces) the load path does not go from the slab up the walls to the roof in my view.

 

RE: Single Story Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces (ASCE7-05)

(OP)
JAE, I agree.  It never made sense to me.  If that were the case, why not include the weight of the slab too?  I talked to my P.E. today and he said it was o.k. to leave the floor mass out so I must have misunderstood him.

Removing the floor mass in the vertical distribution has made my shear wall forces manageable.  I have also kept the floor mass in the base shear for determining anchor reactions.

I will leave this thread unsolved for a few days so someone else can chime in if they want.

Juston Fluckey, E.I.
Engineering Consultant

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources