×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

high impedance fault detection

high impedance fault detection

high impedance fault detection

(OP)
What is the status of providing additional protection for high impedance faults?  Is it widely used?

I have seen papers on it over the years and just wondered if anyone is using it.  Schweitzer has a relay based on harmonic signatures.  Sounds like what Don Russell developed many years ago.

We occasionally drop an overhead conductor on sand and get no fault current.  It's a safety concern, but is the additional protection worth it?  We don't think so, but I'm curious if any utilities out there use high impedance relaying.

RE: high impedance fault detection

We have installed a few relays with Hi-Z protection but I don't think any of those feeders have experienced a high impedance feeder fault since then.  One of the relays did alarm for a loose secondary connection.

RE: high impedance fault detection

From what I've heard, the reason that more utilities have not adopted this is more of a legal issue.  As it was explained to me from a former HP&L Protection Engr, due to the fact that there is a known solution to downed conductors, nearly all lines would have to have them installed, vs. not adopting the technology and having the problem "our of our control", or something to that effect.

Basically it was a way for utilities to shield themselves from the expense of having to upgrade all of their OH Lines that are susceptible to a downed conductor, verses the liability of not having all of the lines protected and someone is harmed.  I was told this several years ago, so this is only the essence of what I remember.

I suppose this would make sense as both GE and SEL have this ability and I've yet to see it used.

I would be interested in what others have to say as well.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources