Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...I signed up to your site to get help with a problem and I am so glad I did. I found the help I needed immediately. Thanks to all who contribute to your site..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
pwht1 (Structural)
16 Nov 11 0:09
Hi,

Would someone please explain how to use table 3.3 (minimum queue lengths at a car park with control points at entrances) in section 3.4?

I'm working on a carpark with 1800 carspaces and with less than 75% in-flow during a peak period (about 500 cars).  The code says the first 100 cars: 3% of capacity, the second 100: 2% of capacity and additional cars: 1% of capacity.  What does this mean?  Should I expext a queue length which is at least 3% of 1800 = 54 cars? a 320m queue is ridiculous....

Thanks for any advice smile
 
rowingengineer (Structural)
17 Nov 11 8:16
A traffic engineer would be able to help you in this instance, the code is very conservative in this regard.  

http://www.nceng.com.au/
"A safe structure will be the one whose weakest link is never overloaded by the greatest force to which the structure is subjected" Petroski 1992

rowingengineer (Structural)
17 Nov 11 8:26
and the awnser to the riddle is 3% of 100 = 3 car lengths
2% of 100 = 2 car lengths
remaining 1600 is 1% = 16 car lengths

making for a total of 21 lengths = x 6m = 126m

I would still seek the advice of a traffic engineer however.  

http://www.nceng.com.au/
"A safe structure will be the one whose weakest link is never overloaded by the greatest force to which the structure is subjected" Petroski 1992

pwht1 (Structural)
17 Nov 11 16:40
Thanks Rowingengineer.  

It's the reference to "percentages of capacity" that is confusing.  If they just said 1st 100 cars then expect 3 vehicle lengths, 2nd 100 cars - 2 vehicle lengths etc it would make it a bit easier.

The traffic engineers are telling me, a traffic engineer in making, to ignore that section of code and aren't providing an alternative source of info.
 
rowingengineer (Structural)
17 Nov 11 21:38
where in Australia are you? State by state is quite different on this issue.  

http://www.nceng.com.au/
"A safe structure will be the one whose weakest link is never overloaded by the greatest force to which the structure is subjected" Petroski 1992

pwht1 (Structural)
17 Nov 11 21:59
The ACT, but apparently the governing body (Territoy and municipal services) have no say in the layout/design of privately owned carparks.   

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close