×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pneumatic actuator leakage standards

Pneumatic actuator leakage standards

Pneumatic actuator leakage standards

(OP)
Is anyone aware of any standards/codes of practice relating to acceptable leakge rates for pnematic actuators?

A pressure-drop method is going to be used as a quality check post assembly but a leakage threshold must be known for this approach to work.

Any help with this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards,
S

RE: Pneumatic actuator leakage standards


I do not know of any official, common tests.  Your question started me thinking about both purpose and limitations for such tests.

1. Leakage and construction?

In practical operational use any pneumatic actuator could leak across piston sealings (if piston), through diaphragm (if diaphragm), through unthight air connections, or leakage could be through attached components (solenoid valves, checkvalves, mechanical stroke adjustment screws etc).

Some actuars will have a thin, limited layer of gliding agent ('grease') that will prevent piston leakage for some (limited) time, some do instead have softer (gliding) sealings against harder (polished) metal.

Leakage across worn piston sealings over time is probably the most common failure. For actuators this would first be critical by leakage costing mony, or leakage large enough to give operation failure.

2. Leakage and purpose of lekage measurements.

a)For pneumatic actuators of good construction you would normally require functional test of valve/actuator together under load at site as startup procedure. Functional tests repated at regular maintenance and test intervals if critical. (See my point 4)

b)By fabrication you would obviously need a factory functional tests.

c)It would certainly also be sensible to include (as a fabrication quality test) a leakage measurement along with functional test for the actuator at fabrication. A high-qality producer should probably test all units. A torque or load force measurement control over some time, when closing off air supply, would indicate critical leakage if force weakens.

Suggestion: If lekage as such should be checked, and if not any other tests available, why not use same test criteria as one would use for the valvetype intended to be actuated, with adapted procedure?

3. If the actuator is operated by other gas than air, special tests suited to the gas characteristic must be done (flammable fluids, toxic fluids, sealing material and other material requirements).

4. On operational tests at site.

Actuators will as valves have most problems occuring under extreme operational conditions.

The purpose of any operational test is to give preventive maintenance at lowest possible total cost (operational stop loss, repair and part cost).

The test intervals must be intended to catch any irregularities 'at start' before they disturb process regular operation.

The operation regularity of the total unit (actuator with pneumatic supply and connections, inner  sealing parts, torque or linear force mechanical application part, dirt and water air quality components, and valve itself) must be totally checked. Leakage of actuator alone would have limited purpose.

Depending on both actuator quality and construction, operational frequency, operational conditions, and same factors for attached valve, could give a lifetime (leakage or mechanical wear or both) shorter or longer for the actuator than for the valve.

(Sorry about the length of the answer, which probably should have been limited to 'no' from my side winky smile)

 

RE: Pneumatic actuator leakage standards

(OP)
Hi gerhardl thank you for your response.

For this particular application 100% of actuators assembled will be leak tested. Currently a water bath technique is used where the actuator is pressurised with compressed air and immersed in water, if any air bubbles are present then the actuator fails.

I will look in to using the same criteria for the actuator as the valve.

Thank you for time and suggestions  

RE: Pneumatic actuator leakage standards



Seems to be a sensible and simple methode!

In addition: all fabrication quality starts with quality control of ingoing materialss and accuracy quality control of produced single parts, also before assembly.

RE: Pneumatic actuator leakage standards

An adage repeated to me only yesterday by an old sage is "you get what you inspect."

rmw

RE: Pneumatic actuator leakage standards

ISO 12490, entitled "Petroleum and natural gas industries —
Mechanical integrity and sizing of actuators and mounting kits for pipeline valves" was published on 15 September 2011 and covers this topic.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources