Global Ply Vs Layup
Global Ply Vs Layup
(OP)
I was wondering what the difference between the two is and why I should use them.
I've defined global plys but they just end up looking like material definitions. Why couldn't I just define the ply as a materials and create the layup with the material definition?
I'm confused why global ply definitions are used.
I've defined global plys but they just end up looking like material definitions. Why couldn't I just define the ply as a materials and create the layup with the material definition?
I'm confused why global ply definitions are used.





RE: Global Ply Vs Layup
Here you are a SIMPLY example of composites solved using FEMAP & NX NASTRAN:
h
Bst regards,
Blas.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Blas Molero Hidalgo
Ingeniero Industrial
Director
IBERISA
48011 BILBAO (SPAIN)
WEB: http://www.iberisa.com
Blog de FEMAP & NX Nastran: http://iberisa.wordpress.com/