×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

overhead line capacity

overhead line capacity

overhead line capacity

(OP)
Currently we are working on a overhead line project. The client specification limits the maximum delivered load for 34.5KV below 40MVA. I am trying to understand the reason behind it. We could use multiple conductor per phase at 34.5KV to increase the overline capacity similar to cables. But our client insists on changing to 72.5KV level, which would cause a lot of design changes. Any suggestions?

RE: overhead line capacity

One limit on transmission line capacity is a combination of the voltage drop and the ability of the OLTC to correct the voltage drop.
Reactance may be a significant portion of the impedance. Parallel conductors will lower the resistance but not the reactance unless a second line is constructed.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: overhead line capacity

(OP)
You meant to regulate the bus which is remote from OLTC? If that is the case, we almost hit 12.5% voltage regulation limit. So we probably have to go with high voltage levels.

RE: overhead line capacity

Actually, the use of bundled conductors does reduce the reactance.

There's probably a good reason behind a 40MVA limit even if it isn't readily apparent.  

RE: overhead line capacity

Hamid, you could always ask the client.
However, if their specification limits it to 40MVA and they as client are insisting on using 72.5kV it doesn't really matter what the reason is, if you want the job.
Regards
Marmite

RE: overhead line capacity

(OP)
Waross was right to the point. Overhead line has much higher reactance than cables. Cables can deliver more power than overhead lines.   

RE: overhead line capacity

No, for a given conductor size, you can transmit far more more using open conductors (overhead) than you can using cable.  Open conductors can both dissipate heat much better than cables and run hotter than cables.

RE: overhead line capacity

(OP)
But reactance is always the limiting factor. If you compare the cable impdance with the overhead conductor impedance, you will notice the reactance of the same size of overhead conductor is much higher than the cable impedance.  

RE: overhead line capacity

The limit may be stability based rather than thermal capacity based.

RE: overhead line capacity

One thing not mentioned is the fact that many if not most distribution circuits are standardized to a maximum load current of 600 amps.  At 34.5 kV, this works out to 36 MVA.  At 12.5 kV, it is 13 MVA.

This standardization permits the use of readily available components like reclosers which typically have 600 A limits.  On the distribution side of things, equipment is used in such high volumes that standardization offers great economies.

If you design it more like a transmission line, then you're more likely to customize it.  In this case, you can consider 72 kV or 115 kV.

We have quite a bit of 35 kV distribution.  On only a handful of situations have we paralleled conductors for higher capacity.

One drawback of introducing 72 kV - if you don't have any other 72 kV on your sytem - you pay a price for the complement of spare equipment.  Of course, if you have other 72 kV stations, it's not an issue.

RE: overhead line capacity

Have they specified the the maximum allowable losses? Losses, stability and per unit voltage drop all improve based on the square of the voltage.

What size wire are you putting in parallel?  670A doesn't seem like a particularly high ampacity, easily reached with 556 MCM conductor.  Do you already have hardware in mind?  Although parallel conductors at above 200 kV is common, I have not run across overhead distribution class equipment designed for it before.

RE: overhead line capacity

(OP)
They haven't specified the power losses. We are considering Drake 795MCM condctor for 35KV lines ( 5km) . The issue is, the voltage drop at the end of the line is about 4% with the voltage regulation at the upstream main substation.
The availability of the autorecloser is another issue. This might be the reason our client specified 40MVA as 35KV Overhead line limit.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources