×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

NX7.5 2D drafting Dimension associativity

NX7.5 2D drafting Dimension associativity

NX7.5 2D drafting Dimension associativity

(OP)
We are migrating from I-Deas to NX7.5  I am now doing my first real drawing with dimensions and text.  Is it better to use the "model" reference set and dimension to the Features Edges, Surfaces Ect.  Or is it better to use the "entire part" reference set to associate our 2D dimension to the reference geometry that we made those features from?  Which method is more robust to keep dimension from losing associativity?  I Started using the "entire part" reference set, but when I switched the reference set back to model all of my dimensions lost associativity

Thanks
 

RE: NX7.5 2D drafting Dimension associativity

When you create a Master Model Drawing, the system defaults to the 'Model' Reference Set for a reason.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
UG/NX Museum:   http://www.plmworld.org/p/cm/ld/fid=209

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: NX7.5 2D drafting Dimension associativity

(OP)
There is many setting that NX defaults to.  I did not know if one way was prefered over the other.  So Model Reference set it is.  Thanks

RE: NX7.5 2D drafting Dimension associativity

Not a wealth of reference set experience here....and what experience I do have with them wasn't used to control the context of the display of the geometry in drafting - it was used to display BREPS (faceted models) of components when working on gigantic assemblies with many components.

Unless I've got a centerline that is almost impossible to define with Utility Symbols, I've always dimensioned to model edges and faces rather than reference/construction geometry.

You could feasibly remove all parameters and then remove all reference geometry from a model and completely blow up all dims on a drawing - using model edges and utility symbols would more than likely keep that from happening.

I'm sure other users might have different approaches - just my experiences and preferences.

Tim Flater
NX Designer

RE: NX7.5 2D drafting Dimension associativity

And as of NX 7.5 there is NO longer any need to use Reference Sets to manage lightweight representations in a large, or for that matter, any size assembly.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
UG/NX Museum:   http://www.plmworld.org/p/cm/ld/fid=209

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: NX7.5 2D drafting Dimension associativity

Not doing so by choice - customer requirement.

Tim Flater
NX Designer

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources