×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

WHICH WAY IS MORE ACCURATE TO MODEL BOLTS

WHICH WAY IS MORE ACCURATE TO MODEL BOLTS

WHICH WAY IS MORE ACCURATE TO MODEL BOLTS

(OP)
Hello,

I work in a structural engineering company.  I have created various models in FEMAP using plate elements and solid elements.  In some of my models, I used degree of freedom springs to model bolts, in other models I used beam elements. Which way would be more accurate?  To me it would seem like degree of freedom springs would be more accurate since you can enter seperate stiffness values: axial stiffness, torsional stiffness, and shear stiffness, where as when you use beam elements, you only have one stiffness of the bolt based on the diameter for the beam element you use.

RE: WHICH WAY IS MORE ACCURATE TO MODEL BOLTS

Hello!,
My preferred method is to use CBAR elements to model the bolt and RBE2 rigid elements to model the bolt head & nut with TX,TY,TZ DOF activated only. If you prefer in FEMAP you have a macro to do the job automatically under "Custom Tools > Meshing > Hole to Hole Fastener". In general I make imprints in the geometry to account for washer, then you can edit the previous macho to ask for surfaces, not edges.

Compared DOF SPRINGs with BEAM elements, well, in my opinion is more time consuming, you have to define a property for each stiffness, in such case I would use better CBUSH elements, this is the TOP of NX NASTRAN, with better integration in FEMAP V10.3.

Best regards,
Blas.

PD
Using CBAR elements to define a bolt do not means you have only ONE stiffnest, this is a beam element, then you account for bending, torsion & axial stiffness based in the bolt diameter, simply, OK?.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Blas Molero Hidalgo
Ingeniero Industrial
Director
 
IBERISA
48011 BILBAO (SPAIN)
WEB: http://www.iberisa.com
Blog de FEMAP & NX Nastran: http://iberisa.wordpress.com/

RE: WHICH WAY IS MORE ACCURATE TO MODEL BOLTS

either method will work adequately.  i'd try side-by-side runs to compare the two approaches.  at the end of the day, whihc gives you reasonable answers for the least amount of work ...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources