Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Where have you been all my life! I found the answer I needed in seconds..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
Corey7320 (Structural)
18 Oct 11 19:09
I am studying the methods documented in the commentary and there is a method of determing the displacment and accelerations over the height of a structure. This is under C6.5.8. There is a term "mode exponenet" that is not defined and is needed. Can any one enlighten me on what this term is?

Thanks,
JoshPlum (Structural)
15 Nov 11 13:34
They usually do a better job of defining their variables.  The key to my understanding is that it is part of the definition of the mode shape. And, we should be able to determine enough about the mode shape to come up with an answer.

Phi(z) = (h/z)^xi

If you know what your mode shape is, then you should be able to estimate your xi (mode component) value... essentially we just do a curve fit and see what value of xi most closely reproduces our known mode shape.  Make sense?


If that's too much work, I suspect that you could set this equal to the 'k' value defiend in seismic chapter (equation 12.8-12 of the 2005 version of ASCE 7). The seismic k value is trying to capture the "whipping" effect of the mode shape for the more flexible structures in comparison to a much more triangular distribution for rigid structures.  So, it is a very similar concept.   
Corey7320 (Structural)
15 Nov 11 17:44
Thanks. That explanation makes sense. Excel can be used to do the curve fit using center of mass ordinates for the primary mode shape in each building direction.  

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close