×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Reclosing on 27.6 kV

Reclosing on 27.6 kV

Reclosing on 27.6 kV

(OP)

Hi All,

I am programming a  GE relay for a new feeder in a 27 kV station. feeder length is approx. 7 miles. Approx. 3 miles of feeder length is underground cable and rest is overhead line.

Is there  a thumb rule that can advise for this feeder not to have reclosing because approx. 50% of feeder length is cable.
Any suggestions ?

RE: Reclosing on 27.6 kV

My suggestion is to not reclose.  If there is significant exposure to trees, squirrels, etc on the overhead portion, you might choose to reclose, recognizing that reclosing into UG faults can increase fault damage and perhaps reduce overall safety.  I'm not aware of any strong consensus on this issue, however.  

In recent years, customers seem much less tolerant of reclosing operations - seeming almost to prefer a longer outage than the brief blips that create problems for all of their electronics.  



 

David Castor
www.cvoes.com

RE: Reclosing on 27.6 kV

Coming at it from a utility perspective, we get penalised for lost customer minutes. Something like 80-90% of overhead line faults are transient which means that most will be successfully reclosed. When the control centre gets an alarm to say that the circuit breaker has tripped, the first thing they will likely do is attempt a manual reclose via scada, so you might as well have the relay try for you. An underground cable fault is a permanent fault in any case, which will require a new piece of cable to replace the faulty section regardless of how many shots have been attempted.
Regards
Marmite

RE: Reclosing on 27.6 kV

Im second with Marmite.

From protection perspective possible do few options for shots, depend on the fault type, etc...



 

RE: Reclosing on 27.6 kV

If the "underground" fault is in a pad-mounted transformer or a switch cabinet, the reclosing can significantly increase damage and hazards to the public.  

It is a arguable point.  For a feeder that is 99% underground and 1% overhead, I don't think very many would argue for reclosing.  So obviously, there is a tipping point somewhere.  

 

David Castor
www.cvoes.com

RE: Reclosing on 27.6 kV

If the underground portion is at the beginning of the feeder, you could use a line recloser at the UG to OH transition.  If the UG portion is after the OH portion, you could put overcurrent protection at the OH to UG transition that is faster than the initial trip on the feeder protection.
 

RE: Reclosing on 27.6 kV

Good point, jghrist.  

David Castor
www.cvoes.com

RE: Reclosing on 27.6 kV

You might also want to install a fault detector at the UG-OH junction and use the info to decide to manually reclose from SCADA . It is cheaper than a second recloser and it could send the info directly to the operator.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources