Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


FFT and IFFT of PSD acceleration and stress

FFT and IFFT of PSD acceleration and stress

FFT and IFFT of PSD acceleration and stress


given a test request which specifies a random vibration profile as a PSD and after running a simulation to get a PSD stress, is it possible to simply carry out inverse fft of the responce (nm^2)^2/Hz to get the stress in the time domain (nm^2/s) and then carry out rainflow counting to estimate fatigue?

The simulation uses modal and linear dynamics to get PSD repsonse.

thanks in advance

RE: FFT and IFFT of PSD acceleration and stress

ifft of a PSD does not make sense.  


RE: FFT and IFFT of PSD acceleration and stress

Sorry, Inverse fourier transformation? reading this paper 'a frequency domain approach for fatigue life estimation from finite element analysis' by Andrew Halfpenny (ncode) suggest that you can regenerate the time signal via an inverse fourier transformation assuming the PSD was created from time history data, but also contunies to say that you may assume the PSD data to have come from time history data in which case (if it actually hadnt or was unknown) would generate a statisically equivilant time history signal anyway.

im not questioning your responces, just desporatly trying to clarify what is essentially a complex subject that i for one have been going in circles with.


RE: FFT and IFFT of PSD acceleration and stress

to reconstruct the time signal you need magnitude and phase.
when you form the psd, the phase information is lost

now you can make assumptions about the system response and construct a phase response per your reference, then reconstruct the time series from the data, but it is no longer the actual data but a guestimate...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close