×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wind Turbine Collapses

Wind Turbine Collapses

Wind Turbine Collapses

(OP)
I have read that there have been a few wind turbine collapses. Does anyone have links to the reports on the causes of these collapses. Here is a video that shows one such collapse. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcrO4USqRfo
Looks like the brakes failed. In at least one other case, a turbine just fell over (Fenner, UK).

HAZOP at www.curryhydrocarbons.ca

RE: Wind Turbine Collapses

I think it will be difficult to obtain accurate information regarding the root causes of these structural failures.  Everyone involved will be trying to shift blame and liability to someone else.  

The failures what caused injuries or loss of life are probably investigated by the government and that is probably the best source of information on the failure mode (eventually).  

The airplane companies and airlines are still pointing fingers about crashes that happened 10 years ago so good luck.   

 

David Castor
www.cvoes.com

RE: Wind Turbine Collapses

Google will show you quite a few mis-haps with wind turbines flying apart, burning, or losing blades.

RE: Wind Turbine Collapses

Maybe it was just too windy ? :)

 

Solid Edge; I-Deas 7 to 12; NX4, NX5 & currently NX6.

RE: Wind Turbine Collapses

Well, yeah, seriously, sometime it just is too windy.

There are several defenses against that, but when your defense mechanism (braking, feathering, yawing, whatever) fails, progressive failure ending in total loss happens often enough to get some bad press.

Part of the problem, if you see the bad press as a problem, is lack of defense in depth.  I.e., it appears to be customary to provide only one defense mechanism against overspeed.

Maybe at some level it makes economic sense.  Since civilians are rarely present, collateral damage potential is limited to a value known at build time, so it may be cheaper to risk loss of the entire structure than to build in redundant overspeed protections or structure able to survive a blade loss.   I'm not privy to any such calculations, but I'm speculating that they could exist.
 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources