Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...The level of expertise is awesome. The nature in which people respond is professional helpful and not the least condescending. I can't say that for most forums..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
kennyb04 (Structural)
23 Sep 11 16:03
I am using Wind Method #2 for Low-Rise Buildings, 6.5.12.2.2 in ASCE7-05.

My question is regarding the GCpf value for the roof uplift in the transverse direction.

For the longitudinal direction, figure 6-10(cont.) note 7 says to use the Zone 2 load for the front(windward) portion of the building and then Zone 3 for the back half (even though both zones are along the same elevation.)

When you look at the roof load in the transverse direction, I think it is a little unclear since there is not a diagram for a monoslope direction.

I originally thought you would use Zone 2 for the front half and Zone 3 for the back half.  Even though our roof is sloping up 0.25/12, it is essentially flat as it is in the longitudinal direction.

However, upon looking at some calcs from another source, it looks like they are using the Zone 2 load for the entire length of the roof with wind applied windward to the monoslope, and then applying wind in the other (leeward) direction of the monoslope they are using Zone 3 for the entire roof.

Any thoughts which way to use?  
ash060 (Structural)
27 Sep 11 17:53
Note 8 in figure 6-10 (cont) covers that situation. So you can use 2.5 times the eave height if it is less than half the direction under consideration.
kennyb04 (Structural)
27 Sep 11 22:11
So would you agree that using the Zone 2 uplift for the entire roof for one load case is overly conservative and that we are able to reduce the back part of the roof to the Zone 3 loads?

Thanks for the input.
ash060 (Structural)
28 Sep 11 15:34
Yes the code tells you where to put the zone 2/3 interface

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close