×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

MKultistage Orifice Assembly

MKultistage Orifice Assembly

MKultistage Orifice Assembly

(OP)
Hi all,

Currently reviewing a design of a multistage orifice assembly before we manufacture it.

We have always used a typical configuration which looks a little something like this.
concentric plate / eccentric plates with differing bore locations down the line / concentric plate.

The reason we have always done this is to prevent a jet from skipping a stage.
We are now about to manufature a three plate assembly which looks like this:
eccentric/concentric/eccentric
I myself see no problem with this configuration but some of my collegues are showing concern simply because this is not the way we have done it before.
I'm just after any thoughts or input that might be of use to me. Are there any implications with this design? etc.

RE: MKultistage Orifice Assembly

What's the separation between plates?

Good luck,
Latexman

RE: MKultistage Orifice Assembly

(OP)
42.85mm. 42.85mm pipe ID also.

RE: MKultistage Orifice Assembly

Our standard is 5 pipe IDs separation between plates.  That allows the flow to mostly recover and you can use the same type plate side-by-side.

1 pipe ID does not allow for much recovery.  Are you maintaining the different bore locations down the line?  If you are, I think it should work as good as the previous configuration.  If you are not, I'd do some testing.

Good luck,
Latexman

RE: MKultistage Orifice Assembly

(OP)
Hmm strange. Our understanding has always been to limit pressure recovery between stages hence the 1D plate spacings. Anyway thanks. I didn't think the new configuration would make any difference at all but try telling that to people who are set in thier ways!

RE: MKultistage Orifice Assembly

zdarlight,
I'm with you on your last post. The purpose of using multistage restrictions is that of getting considerable pressure drop without inducing cavitation or flashing phenomena. If each element is properly sized, why look for pressure recovery between plates?

Is your multistage orifice to be used with single-phase fluid?
 

RE: MKultistage Orifice Assembly

ione,

In the limit of that thinking, why not use zero separation, i.e. a 3X thick orice plate?

I would think if the vena contracta does not have time/separation  to contract and expand, contract and expand, and contract and expand there will be less pressure drop, thus it'll be less efficient and more plates may be needed compared to more separation.  This is probably like zdarlight explained as a jet skipping a stage (or not having to go through as torturous a path).

Does anyone know of some research on this?

Good luck,
Latexman

RE: MKultistage Orifice Assembly

(OP)
Yep, Hydrocarbon gas.

Sorry Latexman, what do you mean by a 3X thick orifice plate?

RE: MKultistage Orifice Assembly

Three 1X thick orifice plates with L/d=1 separation between them - the separation (no pressure recovery) = one 3X thick orice plate.

Not!

Good luck,
Latexman

RE: MKultistage Orifice Assembly

I start from the assumption that such a configuration, I do mean multistage orifices, is used to get a given pressure drop and not for metering purposes. Said that, I'd apply to multistage orifices in those cases where the pressure drop were too "demanding" to be reached in just one step. With the term "demanding" I do mean such a pressure drop that would lead to cavitation. If the same pressure drop could be attained in one stage without any drawback, this would be the way I'd go.
Latexman, with a 3x thick plate the fluid would anyway experience a pressure recovery, since the permanent pressure drop attainable is always lower than the peak pressure drop at the vena contracta, as the fluid expands thus reducing its velocity and increasing its pressure.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources