×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

don't wate money

don't wate money

don't wate money

(OP)
The vast majority of austenitic (non-magnetic) stainless used is 304, which has 18% chromium and 8% nickel. The nickel does nothing to enhance corrosion resistance       ( except very slightly in rare cases) and does a lot to increase the cost. 8% x $3.00/lb = $0.24 per pound of stainless at cost. This is then further marked up by distributors.
 A much better buy is 201 which can easily do identically well in all regards in the nearly all of the applications for which 304 is specified. This grade at wholesale list price is $0.12/lb less expensive.
 201 can substitute directly for 304 with no part re-engineering because it meets all food contact specs and ASTM specs and can be purchased with identical mechanical properties (important for formability).
 Distributors and some producers discourage its use because it forces them to carry or produce another grade without enhancing their profits.
 Many of the largest users of stainless in the US have switched to 201 and saved $millions per year.

RE: don't wate money

(OP)
Hi motorworks
 The ability to resist salt water is a function of how hot and salty the water is. Resistance is proportional to the chromium, molybdenum, aand nitrogen content ( see FAQ in this forum). In my rather extensive experience 201 has performed perfectly well in all ambiant environments, e.g. commercial kitchens, interior architecture, food machinery.
If you need 316, 201 isn't enough. If you use 304, 201 is probably OK.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources