×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Commercial HVAC Humidfication System Efficiency

Commercial HVAC Humidfication System Efficiency

Commercial HVAC Humidfication System Efficiency

(OP)
Trying to come up with arguments for various methods of humidification in large scale (high-rise building) HVAC systems.  

I don't know the answer myself and will be spending the next couple hours trying to find it and was wondering if anyone had any good information or opinions on preferred humidification methods.

Because we are in the LEED world, energy cost difference is key and I am having a hard time understanding the impact on an energy model, considering ASHRAE 90.1 doesn't specify a baseline design for humidification systems.   

Basically, the project in question is in China, where steam humidfication is the standard, and I was to present an arguement that a steam or fogger system would be more energy efficient.

Anyone have any thoughts or suggestions?

Thanks.

RE: Commercial HVAC Humidfication System Efficiency

I can't say i've ever calculated this but...

Given that (deliberate) humidification in comfort systems almost always goes with heating, it would make sense that direct injection of steam would be more efficient on the airside part of the equation as the steam injection would not require the addition of heat that comes with misting water at a lower temp which evaporatively cools the air.

The waterside of the equation says that cold/room temp clean water is a lot less energy intensive to produce than clean steam - there might be the same kJ/kgK (Btu/lbm.degF) to make water at a given temp vaporize into steam, however misting is done at the point of use, and the steam has substantial production and transportation losses.

Overall, I think a misting recirculating water system would work more efficiently, particularly when the water is substantially warmer than the air - preheated even.

Other high efficiency systems like ultrasound are a maintenance joke and i'm not sure would peg out on a whole building scale anyway.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources