×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Standard for Rail Elevation

Standard for Rail Elevation

Standard for Rail Elevation

(OP)
Is there a standard for drawing rail elevations.  I've attached a sketch with two approaches.  The detailed one has a line for each transition in curvature.  The simplified one has lines for the mid point of the sloped portion of the head and base.  Is the simplified one common practice?

Dik

RE: Standard for Rail Elevation

I wouldn't do it either way. The CL is not an axis of symmetry, so I don't know why you put it as a CL. You haven't labeled any of the fillet arcs, and none of what appear to be your dimension line extensions correlate to any meaningful geometry point.

I would've thought that a rail cross-section is a standard that belongs to the client, if not the over-seeing agency (so I would expect e.g. a single standard for all HSR in Europe).  

RE: Standard for Rail Elevation

(OP)
Thanks, francesca...

The CL is the centre of bolts for a 40# rail... I drew the lines close enough to show the relative points of the curves/tangents they represented, I thought.  I didn't show any of the fillet radii....  Rail sections come with relatively standard dimensions and 'fittings'; they are not normally 'client' driven.

To draw all the points of transition as lines, leads to a 'cluttered' drawing as shown.  I don't know if there's a standard manner of showing this.  With W-Sections, I don't show the fillet lines and with S-Sections (I-Sections) I show the mid point of the tapered flange.

Dik

RE: Standard for Rail Elevation

The mid-point of the tapered flange of an S section has some significance, as in roughly where any bolts go.  Rails are not secured that way, ever, so there's no reason to show a gage line that's not defined.

In a simplified view, I show lines at the theoretical sharp upper outer corner of the flange, and the t.s.c. of the bottom of the rail head, but I'm aware of no standard.

In a detail view, I show lines wherever the curvature changes, as you have, just because it adds clarity and a bit of style.  I also, sometimes, truncate all those extra lines, just showing them near rail ends, mostly so the pseudo-shaded rail doesn't dominate the view.



 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Standard for Rail Elevation

(OP)
Thanks, Mike... no need to show them for the full length of the rail; even with thin lines, the rail was getting pretty 'dark'.

DIk

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources