×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASTM Gradation for Very Large Diameter Material

ASTM Gradation for Very Large Diameter Material

ASTM Gradation for Very Large Diameter Material

(OP)
Hello,

I am working on a project that involves relocation of a waste rock pile consiting of material with diameters up to 6-12 inches.  Most of the material is very large, only a small fraction appear to be fines.  

Is there a way to determine the grain size distribution of this material for use in correlating D10 with internal friction?  Most of the material would not fit in a standard ASTM D422 aparatus.  I would also be interested in any other ways to determine internal friction (for use in modeling slope stability)... box shear? Any other ideas?  Thanks!

RE: ASTM Gradation for Very Large Diameter Material

Hi Scottm8

A good visual investigation will may help you better then implementation of few tests (difficult to realize if you haven't any suitable devices, like in stone pit or career devices), and that will be then used in correlation , and not provide you a direct final value (friction angle - Phi).

In your case if most of the material is really composed of small rock blocs from 6 to 12 inches, then the global behaviour of this material is surely granular. Moreover if blocs mainly present multiples angles the friction angle will easily rise up to 40° - 42° or more

If you have easy and direct access to the site, a second way of investigation is to note the tilt of the slope of some existing heap of this material. This natural angle will be close to the effective friction angle.

As this predictive value of Phi is relatively high (40 - 42 ° ?), this make it not very sensitive for your computation, (such a granular material get a strong strength, that won't change lot of ratio in your stability computation results), so you can accept a certain error range on this parameter, and consider for safety, parameter coming from the lower part of your uncertainty range.

This depends on the risk related to your project accordingly to your design. Up to you to appreciate it. If the associated risk is low or normal, trusting on your material description, I think that friction angle will rise easily to 40°

Picture of the material could help to get a remote judgment.

Regards

RE: ASTM Gradation for Very Large Diameter Material

Try to find "Review of Shearing Strength of Rockfill" by Thomas Leps in July 1970 ASCE Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations.  It contains a review of large-scale triaxial tests.  That will at least give you a justifiable basis.

No idea of what your budget is, but there are few projects with budgets in which large-scale testing will be practical.

Even if you were able to get a particle sizer analysis done (and you would need A LOT of material) I would be cautious about using a correlation to D10.  I don't know the exact correlation you are talking about, if it is for soils like sands, are you significantly extrapolating the correlation?

RE: ASTM Gradation for Very Large Diameter Material

I have run size analysis on samples with some boulders as large as 3 feet, (It takes a very full dump truck) and have run a number of direct shears on the -#4.
In my experience, with my materials, it appears that most 'mature' river deposits, the -#4 is about the same degree of 'shape' (round to sub-round) as the coarse fraction and the shear strength comparisons to final construction appeared good.
In my experience, with my materials, it appears that for most colluvial & debris fan deposits, the -#4 is not the same degree of 'shape' (angular to sub-angular for the larger sizes & sub-rounded to sub-angular for the -#4) and the shear strength comparisons to final construction appeared conservative.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources