×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Boring locations-Parking Stucture

Boring locations-Parking Stucture

Boring locations-Parking Stucture

(OP)
I am looking at a 186x120 5 or 6 story parking structure and the arch is asking for boring locations. I am think of at least 3 borings: close to NE corner, center, close SW corner. Is 3 borings reasonable for this footprint?

Thanks,

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

Joe,

I would probably recommend 4 for a project this size though I am sure many have been done as low as 2 boreholes.

The problem that I can see with your configuration is that potentially if you have a linear feature such as a dyke or former river e.t.c. then all three boreholes may coincide with the line of this.

4 boreholes can give you a reasonable 3d layout of strata e.t.c. that you can hang your hat on. Also, I expect you will be using this data for CBR e.t.c. for the ground level slab and this would help.

If you have to use 3 boreholes move the middle one off centre so you can get a good approximation of bedding planes e.t.c.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

Agree with csd72.  In addition, locating borings is a shot in the dark unless you have some reasonably reliable site history or historical geological data that might lead you in a certain direction.  Here's where I would go with 4 borings....

***********************************************
* o                                           *
*                                             *
*                                  o          *
*                                             *
*                                             *
*              o                              *
*                                             *
*                                           o *
***********************************************

Yes, you might miss something.  Cover that eventuality with a statement in your report such as "Subsurface conditions will vary between borings.  Interpolation of conditions between boring locations should not be done by others.  Interpolation for this evaluation is based on the information available at the time of the report and could change with further, more precise information."

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

(OP)
csd, Ron,

Thanks. I guess the 4th boring would not be not that expensive since they would already mobilized and present on site.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

Depends on the soil conditions in the area. When I am asked about boring layout I always refer to the geotechs recommendation. There is so much liability involved and the geotech has the language to cover the uncertainity built into their contracts and reports.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

My sketch didn't turn out as planned!  I think the gist is still there.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

I would defer to the Geotech on number of borings and their location.  That being said 3-4 sounds in the right ballpark

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

Work for a company that offers geology and geotech services amongst other things, though we don't actually drill we monitor and interpret the results...

SPTs are cheap compared to the cost of the structure overall, drop in the bucket. And you are right, once they are mobilized there is not a huge difference between 3 or 5. I always like to pick at least one highly loaded pad footing area if you are that far ahead in your design development.

Alternatively to the throw darts at the side of a barn SPT technique, you can hire a company that can do some geophysical testing (ER, GPR) over a large swath of area that may locate anomalies that can than be drilled for further exploration. These are not prohibitively expensive either.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

It really depends on the geologic history of the site.  For this small of a garage I would still think a Geo engineer should be on-board.  Tell the geo where your shear walls will be and give him your high and low estimated column bearings. With enough local history you may not have to do any borings (not a recommendation).

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

why would you dictate the boring locations to the geotech? In fact, I would not dictate the precise number of borings either. Call your favorite geotech, discuss the project with them, agree on a work plan and then rely on the recommendations they give in their proposal. I guarantee they will not skimp on the number of borings. It's usually the other way around...

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

It is usually given for a cost estimate for the geotech's work. I leave the final number up to the geotech in case they find inconsistencies in the couple of locations I recommend.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

It sounds like you all covered it well.  Except the title of the thread deserves one more: yes, parking structures are frequently quite boring. (sorry, the urge to say it was overwhelming)

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

Quote:

Except the title of the thread deserves one more: yes, parking structures are frequently quite boring. (sorry, the urge to say it was overwhelming)

Beat me to it! LOL

 

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

(OP)
OK, BORINGSSS, happy now. The things that engineers find amusing!

No wonder George Costanza wanted to be an architect, not an engineer.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

For a 22,000 sq. ft building, 5 borings are considered adequate.  We like to see at least one deep boring at 50 to 60 ft depth.  This deep boring tells us about any burried or compressible layers at depth.  

www.FoundEng.com  

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

(OP)
FixedEarth, thank you. Good info.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

JB- I wish I had the paper.  There was a case study of several buildings in southern Germany that were fine for about 50 years and then the foundation started settling.  When the forensic soils investigation was completed, they found deep seated settlement due to burried compressible soils.

Your geotechnical engineer will guide you.  I was involved in 4 story parking garage few years ago and we ended up driving 16 inch square precast concrete piles about 65 ft length.  We had a basement level and that helped in partially compensating the building weight.  Our soils were medium dense Silty SAND and I think water table was at 15 ft+/-.

www.FoundEng.com  

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

I would typically think 3 to 5 borings, w/One deep for the oddball things (see FixedEarth) & for better info for seismic data. A lot depends on what my knowledge of the area is.

That being said.
"cvg (Civil/Environme) why would you dictate the boring locations to the geotech? In fact, I would not dictate the precise number of borings either. Call your favorite geotech, discuss the project with them, agree on a work plan and then rely on the recommendations they give in their proposal."
How do you, as a Structural PE expect to be treated?
I am sorry if that sounds a little hard to some.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

My first thought would be to ascertain what the anticipated soil conditions are. The overall area geology (physiographic) regions and any information you might be able to find from nearby structures would be very useful to determine if one has a potentially variable site or a fairly uniform site. Uniform soil conditions?  Soft over hard or dense? dense over soft?  Will likely foundations be piled or spread footings?

Is the site "new" or has there been previous structures on it in the past is another question I would find out - if there is potential for areas of fill, this might require some additional shallow borings.

Based on this, I would tailor the programme to meet my expectations.  I agree that 5 borings  would be prudent.  The depths of the borings would be chosen to match the expectations.  If there is a "great" chance that it will be spread footings, then you might go shallow borings at the corners and a deeper one in the center with the corner borings to prove the basic upper strata (which usually is the variable to be proven).  

If you have sands over soft clays, for instance, you might need additional borings to confirm the sand thickness. If the sand thickness is uniform, you might be able to get away with spread foundations so that the pressure bulbs do not extend to the soft clay.  However, if the sand thickness is variable, this wouldn't be an option.

If you have the potential for fills at the site - old basements that have been backfilled, etc., you may need to do additional borings to confirm the site variability.  A firm I worked for in Philly always did test pits besides the borings just for this reason.

Now if you are in Europe - do you need UXO clearances?

 

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

(OP)
@FixedEarth: I understand the 50-60' depth for a better check and also to determine seismic site class, but typically what would be your other recommended boring depths?

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

JoeBaseplate
The depth of borings is a function of the geology, the anticipated building loads and the probable foundation types. This actually is a very difficult question to answer without a good feeling for the geology.  If I know very little about a site or area, I fall back to the borings are to be at least as deep as the total usable structure is high, including basements. This boring depth begins at the anticipated building base.

I remember a coal loadout silo in Western Colorado, encountered over 120' of a very rocky, wet & soft debris fan deposits. Never did find bottom. Broke the drill auger at 30' below the ground surface and excavated a 30' pit to facilitate the 'fishing'. Took a number of shelby samples in the soil & rock mess, which ended up being the best samples of the 6 day Drilling Follies.  Eventually placed the silo on a structural fill and concrete matte. Performed well for 30 years, until removed after the mine was closed.

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

JB;

Not sure if you have on grade parking outside the parking structure, but typically, we would use 2@50 ft, 3@35 ft and 1@15 ft for outside parking, if any.  See attached bor. loc. map, if you have rectangular structure.  We would do all the 35 ft borings first and based on the soil stratigraphy, pick the 2 deep boring locations.  If you go to the City, and for some municipalities online, you can see old grading & investigation reports.  Your geotechnical firm might also be able to order some aerial photos and have the engineering geologist look into existing geologic maps. There is a lot of art to this but experienced firm should be involved.  

www.FoundEng.com  

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

I think it is inappropriate for the structural engineer to be determining borehole numbers, locations or depths.  These should be determined by the geotechnical engineer on the basis of local knowledge and geotechnical considerations.  The architect should know better than to ask that question of the structural engineer.

BA

RE: Boring locations-Parking Stucture

(OP)
BA,

That is exactly the way I see it and my response has always been that "this my opinion, final locations, numbers and depths are to be determined by the soils consultant".

There are a couple of architects  whom I have been working with for a while, they just like to get structural engineer's opinion.

The rest of questions above are for my knowledge since we have a Gtech expert (FixedEarth) sharing his expertise.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources