×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

P-DELTA with diaphragms with small elevation differences (RAM SS)

P-DELTA with diaphragms with small elevation differences (RAM SS)

P-DELTA with diaphragms with small elevation differences (RAM SS)

(OP)
I have a colleague working on a small building where the architect has raised/stepped half of one of the floors by about 2.5 feet.  This has created (2) diaphragms where there was one.  The engineer decided to model the structure in RAM with an additional storey 2.5 feet above the original level.  

The location where the two diaphragms diverge/split is along a braced frame line.

Suddenly she was getting P-Delta issues.   My assessment was that:

A) Since there actually are (2) diaphragms, and each one needs to deliver its forces to an appropriate LFRS.  That is, we needed to stiffen the structure at one diaphragm which originally had few frames.  This is a basic engineering issue I think we solved.

B) The P-Delta analysis errors (which force the analysis to stop if the p-delta option is chosen) arise from the fact that the diaphragms are delivering shears and associated deflections across a small height difference of column at the braced frame line.  These effects are REAL and MUST be dealt with by appropriate stiffness or load transfer to limit the deltas in displacements.

C) All the other stability factors calculated for the higher diaphragm, EXCEPT at the interface of the diaphragms, are calculated based on the artificially low storey height.  I'd like to calculate these using the true storey height at this half of the building.  Q:  Is this appropriate, and or possible in RAM SS?

D) As a final note, I thought we might deal with this by adjusting the top of column elevation for the higher part but retaining the same story designation, and deal with the artificially sloping members at the interface.  We would still need to model a diaphragm split here, and still need the original model to capture the effects in (B) above.  Is that heading in the right direction?  

Thanks.
 

RE: P-DELTA with diaphragms with small elevation differences (RAM SS)

(OP)
Sorry.  Trying to remove this post.  It is in the wrong forum!!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources