×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pilot Experience as an Engineer
10

Pilot Experience as an Engineer

Pilot Experience as an Engineer

(OP)
I am an aeronautical engineering senior interested in flight testing and aerodynamics, and I am currently applying for a commission in the air force.  Originally it was my plan to be a non-rated developmental engineer, but my recruiter mentioned a large need for pilots this year, so I am considering going for a rating.  I am healthy and very good in simulators, but I would require corrective eye surgery.  I have always been interested in flying and fully intend to get a private license if nothing else.  My question is, should I become a pilot if my ultimate goal is working as an engineer?  Obviously I won't be doing any engineering work the first few years (commitment of four years) but I feel that being in the pilots seat for a few years is the best way to evaluate design applications and requirements.  Similar to the difference between looking at some car specs and actually driving the car. On the other hand, I definately do not want to be a career pilot.

I expect the career path would look something like this:

~4 years pilot --->  1 year getting masters ---> x years as AF engineer or test pilot  ---> civilian engineer

Of course that all depends on what the air force needs.  Is this realistic?  I'm afraid I am biased by the romance of being a pilot ;) so some outside opinions would be greatly appreciated.

The story so far:
In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.  

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

In the Air Force, pilots fly. That is their job. They might have a collateral job as Squadron Maintenance Officer or such, but that is to get their tickets punched to become the Commanding Officer and higher.
Also, verify the eye correction thing. It could restrict the type of flying you could do (in the Air Force)
Air Force Engineer or Test Pilot...two very different fields.
The vast majority of actual Test Pilot flying is done at the manufacturer. Most people confuse Test Pilot with Post Maintetance Check Flight Pilot, because that is what they like to call themselves. "I'm a Test Pilot" vs "I'm a Post Maintenance Check Flight Pilot", which sound Cooler!

Carefully check it out. As far as Recruters...Trust, but verify.

Rerig
Retired Navy.   

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

As far as engineering goes, a maintenance officer would gain more relevant experience than a pilot. No better way to learn whats good and bad design than seeing everything that goes wrong. A pilot won't see much more than the cockpit.

Comprehension is not understanding. Understanding is not wisdom. And it is wisdom that gives us the ability to apply what we know, to our real world situations

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

2
While I can't comment on being a pilot or an aeronautical engineer, since I'm neither, I guess I can make the analogy with respect to something which I can relate to.  Many of our customers are automotive OEM's or they are major suppliers to the industry, and I suspect that if they found out that I had never driven nor attempted to tinker with a car before, that despite my 40+ years experience as a Mechanical Engineer, in their eyes, my credibility would suffer.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm sure that many of the people who hold aeronautical degrees and/or who work with clients in the aerospace industry are NOT pilots and they are still able to do their jobs effectively and satisfy their customers (after all, we also have many aerospace customers which I have to deal with).  That being said, I also suspect that those who ARE experienced pilots DO manage to leverage that to their personal and professional advantage.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.com/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

I don't think I met any 'design engineers' that were ex air-force pilots - or even ex air force engineering officers or senior techs.  Most of the ex airforce folks I met were in management of one kind or another - often project/program management or on the trials/test side of things.

However, most, if not all, of the serious test pilots I spoke to seemed to have engineering degrees.

When I was your age I had the dream of flying aircraft with the RAF for a few years then designing them.  With hindsight I'm not sure how realistic that was these days, given how complex they are and how rusty your engineering degree may get in the years you aren't really using it.

I'll have to disagree a bit with cast metal, sure a maintenance engineer will learn a lot as relates to designing for maintenance, but in terms of end function, well the pilot may learn a bit more of that.  The primary role of the aircraft isn't to be easy to maintain - though that is a very important consideration.

As to Johns point, well relatively few folks get to be pro pilots, and even fewer of them then return to start an engineering career pretty much from scratch.

Conceptually your idea sounds reasonably and is appealing, however I suspect it may be trickier in practice.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

2
After serving in the military and then working as an engineer in the civilian world, I've come up with a fairly standard statement that I tell my undergraduate students when they ask me about military service after getting an engineering degree:

If you want to be a design engineer, don't go into the military, go to work for a design firm. If you are interested in project engineering/project management, or operations or maintenance engineering positions as a career, service in the military is fine.

While you are spending your time as a military pilot/operations/maintenance engineer and forgetting much of what you learned in your engineering education, your peers that went into design are gaining valuable design experience.

 

xnuke
"Live and act within the limit of your knowledge and keep expanding it to the limit of your life." Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged.
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

(OP)
Thanks all for your input, it's a greater (and much faster) turnout than I expected.

I am aware military engineers are not involved in design, and that's fine.  My first plan (before becoming muddled by Tom Cruise) is to get the defense side of the process and use that as a springboard into a competitive civilian engineering career.  Also, I'm not decided yet, I just started the military application first as it is the most extensive.

I'm glad to hear that I'm not the first to think of using pilot experience to increase engineering insight. From your responses, however, it seems unrealistic at best.  Like becoming a pro-racer in order to design cars... not likely.  I'll do some additional research, but until then I'll just consider it a fantasy.

I want to design my shiny metal suit, and then I want to use it to kick some bad guy butt. Preferably with a quirky robotic butler.

The story so far:
In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.  

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

If the opportunity to serve as a pilot in the military is there then I strongly suggest that you take it. Yes, it will alter your career path away from design but if you have the personality that wants to be in the military, I'm going to say that you probably wouldn't be content for very long doing civilian design work. After college I was interested in joining the Air Force and went through all the applications to goto officer school but wasn't selected. Turns out that the Air Force has no problem filling their ranks with service academy and enlist to officer people. That is why I say if the opportunity is there then take it. I ended up joining the Army enlisted and becoming a tank gunner. The experience was life changing, served time in Iraq during the troop surge fighting bad guys in their neighborhood. When I got out the economy was in the drain but my engineering/military experience helped me land decent jobs until I finally got the job I wanted. I say definately go for it because if you only do one term in the military you can easily pick up your career. If you decide you want to do design you can always get your masters after military so you wouldn't have a problem convincing people that your skills are still fresh.  

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

Seconding the trust but verify sentiment, be sure get a realistic estimate of making it into the flight program, and then all the way through three different flight schools.  You will be competing against others who have dreams of being career pilots instead of using it as a stepping stone. Also check whether each school would increase your AF commitment to more than 4 years; I  vaguely remember hearing that time at the multi-engine school and the cargo or fighter school does not count towards the 4 years.  Even if you don't end up flying, the AF can open up a world of other opportunities.

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

3
I would recommend against the military for an entirely different reason.  But so that you will understand my point, some background.

I spent 20 years and 10 months in the US Air Force as enlisted maintenance on aircraft and loved almost every minute of it.  (There were a few times in basic training I had to police cigarette butts and I have never smoked...those particulat minutes are about the only part of my career I didn't like).

My wife was also US Air Force until I got her pregnant.  In the early '70's that was an allowable reason to leave the service.  Took me three years though, I am a slow learner.  clown

My daughter spent six years in the Air National Guard.  My youngest son spent five years in the US Marine Corps.  (No he was NOT a disppointment to his aerospace family...he was in Marine Aviation!)  He spent nine months in Afghanistan and came home safe and healthy, thank God.

I tell you all this so you will understand I love the US military, especially the grand people who serve.  God bless every one of them.  I have some harsh words that some may take as a slam against those who serve.  If you believe I am saying that, please re-read my post again and try to see my side of it.  My beef is not and never will be with those who serve.

I no longer recommend the US military to anyone as a career.  During the last fifteen years or so I have watched an extremely disturbing trend of our civilian leadership (and yes I fully support the Constitutional requirement that our military report to and remain servant to our civilian leadership) to waste the lives of our best and brightest on da** fool missions with no strategy that benefits the US and dumba** tactical requirements that guarantee unnecessary danger to our military people.

Therefore if my grandchildren ask, given the current trend of our civilian leadership, I will recommend no...as I will recommend to anyone else who asks.

I realize my post is not strictly engineering related, but it does relate to the OP.  I remember reading of the hopes and dreams of those Navy Seals who just died for the chance to serve.  I just want to make sure stklye (the OP) remembers that choosing the military as a stepping stone has many wonderful benefits (teaching me as a 17 year old to get my head removed from my nether regions and learn to discipline myself to achieve a goal was defintely a PLUS) but he cannot look at the military as a stepping stone without properly balancing the hazards.

To end this on a lighter note, I have always liked the silly saying that if you are going to be enlisted in the military, join the Air Force.  The reason is that for the most part in all the other services the enlisted people fight right along side their officers.  In the Air Force, except for a few specialties that were enlisted flying positions, we enlisted folks waved goodbye from the relative safety of the base while the officers flew off to fight!   

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

Nonetheless, not everything that the country does should be couched only in the light of benefits to the US.  We ostensibly fight on the side of "right" and while we may need to pick and choose our fights because of resource limits or because the fights are unwinnable, fighting for freedom and against oppression should still count for something, regardless of whether there's an actual benefit to the US.

Who will come to our aid, when we're the 3rd world country beset by Colombian and Mexican drug lords and their minions?  Will the rest of the world turn a blind eye because there's no benefit for them?

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Chinese prisoner wins Nobel Peace Prize

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

IRstuff:

As I noted, my post was not strictly engineering related except as it touched the OP's decision making, and thus it would not be wise for me to continue this particular discussion of the political arena.  I only brought it up to provide background for my recommendation.

Allow me to say I certainly see your view point and respect you for it, just as I also respect you for the many excellent engineering posts of yours that I have read on this forum...and I have been reading this forum for several years.

I think you and I would have a rousing and delightful political discussion in another more suitable forum and probably find we are far more in agreement than we realize.  clown

Best regards to you...

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

(OP)
I appreciate what you're saying debodine, but while I don't always agree with the government, I don't think that's grounds enough to prevent serving. A large part of why I want to join is to help prevent useless losses that come from bad decisions such as putting a lumbering, unarmed chinook into combat zones.  I loved that last line though, that's pretty funny.

Although it might not be the best use of my time, strictly in terms of engineering experience, I think being a pilot would benefit me in many other ways and is worth looking into.  I've also posted on military.com forums to see if it's even possible for a pilot to become an engineer.

Although I'm sure it upsets some people, personally, I always enjoy watching a forum evolve into other discussions.  Keeps things interesting :)

I also want to say that the amount of respect I see in these forums is a league apart from the rest of the internet, and I'm glad I can be a part of it.

The story so far:
In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.  

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

Quote (stkyle):


Although I'm sure it upsets some people, personally, I always enjoy watching a forum evolve into other discussions.  Keeps things interesting :)

If you think we're having fun here, you should come over to the 'Engineering Language/Grammar Skills Forum' where we've got a thread up to over 100 responses dealing with the subject of whether you single- or double-space at the end of a sentence.  And in that same forum we have another thread with 50 responses concerning whether lavatory signs should read 'MENS' or simply 'MEN'.  And I hate to think of what's going to happen with the latest thread which was started this morning on the proper use of 'Adjectives'.

And we're mostly engineers here winky smile

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.com/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

Debodine: likewise.  Obviously, we agree that many, if not all, of the military adventures we've had were certainly quagmires of one kind or another.  

stkyle: As a general rule, your piloting experience would only be applicable in a few arenas, aircraft design, and systems engineering.  However, most aircraft design companies have full-time pilots already, so there's that, plus, there are always lots of ex-pilots.  

The systems engineering aspect would be for defense and aerospace companies looking for people who have experience in combat systems and contacts in the military procurement.  Most of the ex-pilots aren't hired specifically to do engineering design, but they do participate in conceptual design.  I usually run into ex-pilots in our company doing essentially marketing and business development.  If there are ex-pilots doing engineering, they are not necessarily identified as such, but, my particular division is primarily sensor oriented, so piloting experience is not terribly applicable.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Chinese prisoner wins Nobel Peace Prize

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

Stkyle

You have missed the point.
If you join the Air Force to become a pilot, you will become a pilot. You will plan, fly, debrief, eat, sleep and dream flying.
Until you have Stars on your shoulder, you won't have any say in what the Air Force flies. (20+ years)
You will be a "Butter Bar" (2nd Lt) and say "Yes Sir" a lot!

Once you have raised your right hand to protect and defend your country, you belong to The Air Force and it really doesn't matter what YOU want to do. They can't kill you, but they can make you wish you were dead!

DO I MAKE MYSELF CLEAR MISTER! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!

My advice is: become an engineer and learn to fly on your own.

No, you can't fly a C-17 as a civilian, but as a "Butter Bar", how are your coffee fetching skills. And as you mentioned your vision...only 20/20 get to fly fighters. And once a pilot, forget spending time as an Engineer. Then you owe them 6 years minimum. Plus Reservist time.

This isn't about being a Patriot. This is about the Military telling you what you are going to do with your life. What if you only qualify as a Helo Driver. (Not sure if the Air Force has Helos)

"But that's isn't what I want to do!"
"Too bad, the Air Force needs you there!"

But if you want to be a pilot, Go Air Force.
(Navy...see attachment. Landing on a moving target)

Rerig
US Navy Retired
Daughter - 10 years Air Force

 

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

stkyle,

I recommend a book titled "Rogue Warrior" to you.  It is about Richard Marchinco the man who created Seal Team 6 which is so much in the news lately.

I am recommending it to you not so much for the Seals and their exploits part of it but for the Bravo Sierra he had to put up with as part of military life, and how he as a rugged individualist survived (and ultimately didn't survive) and even thrived in that culture.

It will give you a good view of Service Academy grads vs. non "ring draggers" and the relative position of each in the 'pecking order' along with the butt kissing, etc that goes along with it.

To all you former USN or USMC and/or former Seals, I am not making any comparison between the Seals program and the USAF; frankly there is none.  I am trying to give stkyle something to read that will give him an inkling of what rerig stated above.  When you join the military, anyone and I mean anyone with half a stripe more than you have OWNS you.

It isn't like there isn't some of the same in the corporate world, but it is totally different in the military.

rmw

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

Go fly - I tried but it was just after Viet Nam and they had too may pilots.  Maybe just a macho thing - but it will never hurt!!

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

I work for a construction company, roads, bridges, that sort of construction, and one of the Civil Engineers in the company is typed in the Jet, and occasionally flys the recip twins & helicopter. We have a full time chief pilot, but the Engineer sits right seat on any trip he goes on for his regular job. I've never seen him fly captain by himself, however. Occasionally he'll fly left seat with the chief pilot as co pilot to preserve his currency. I think he's ex military, corp of engineers.

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

There is a lot of misinformation in this thread. I'll try to correct the most significant things.

BLUF:  Pursuing a pilot slot is a reasonable course of action based on your stated goals.  But you should do more research.

1) The commitment for pilot training will extend beyond your initial commitment.  Ask about the commitment.
2) You probably won't be able to be released from flying to get your master's until you have 6-8 years in, and then the number of people that are released is small.  Perhaps as small as 2 per year.  
3) Once you are a pilot, you wouldn't become an FTE, you would become a test pilot.  But isn't that better?
4) Definitely verify the vision thing.
5) "Pilots fly" is correct.  However, being a pilot does give you a little more flexibility than some career fields.  Example, there  are "P62E" slots that are engineering slots that require a rated pilot. "Squadron Mx Officer" is not a collateral job in the USAF and would not be filled by a pilot.
6) "The vast majority of actual test pilot flying is done at the manufacturer".  It is true that the early portions of flight test programs are conducted using civilian test pilots.  I'm not sure I would say the "vast majority", nor would I say it is done at the manufacturer.  Lots of OEMs test at USAF facilities, w/ gov involvement.  Also, I would say that the *vast majority* of civilian test pilots are former military test pilots--at least the good ones.
7) "Pilots won't see more than the cockpit".  False.  You can see as much of the aircraft as you want--its you butt.  Good pilots know a lot about their aircraft.  Mx officers actually don't see much of a/c.  They sign a lot of EPRs.
8) "Until you have Stars on your shoulder, you won't have any say in what the Air Force flies".  Obviously, the big decisions are made by senior officers, but test pilots (and FTEs) can have a big input into those decisions. And they can have virtually 100% input in small decisions.  I've seen many cockpit working groups and DRBs make decisions based on one person's opinion.
9) "Once you have raised your right hand to protect and defend your country, you belong to The Air Force and it really doesn't matter what YOU want to do. They can't kill you, but they can make you wish you were dead!"  Obviously, AFPC gets to make the final decisions in your career.  But you get a lot more control than the above implies.  Also, if you are good, you get more control.  I've had 9 jobs and I've picked all of them but 2 (and I've turned one down).

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

The OP didn't mention marital status, which must (or should be) be considered.

Lots of women don't do well with the strains of military life.

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

(OP)
Yup, I'm well aware of the family strains that military life creates.  Part of the reason I am interested in the service is (unfortunately) I do not have any immediate prospects for starting a family.

Thanks for your input 62e, you have verified what I learned from my interview and recruiter.

The interview went very well for those that are interested.  The interviewer (a Lt. Col.) asked me to write up some extra information for him and I surprised him by already having it with me.  I also did some research before hand and saw that he was awarded a bronze star, so we talked about that for a while too.  He was impressed with my enthusiasm and grades/scores and said I was a very competitive candidate.  I need to get a physical and take a pilot candidate test and then I'll be submitting my application to the board.  In the mean time, I'll be researching and taking some more flight lessons.

Thanks again, everyone, for all the feedback.  This thread went much further than I thought it would and was much more helpful than military,com

The story so far:
In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.  

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

I strongly recommend that you get a pilots license.  I got a pilots license and an instrument rating after being an A&P and later an Avionics Engineer for years.

I was amazed at how much depth it added to my understanding of what is going on.  

There are many successful people working in the business with a complete absence operational knowledge and no exposure to well known rudimentary basics and history outside their area of focus. You can occasionally catch people lacking a broader background BS-ing a bit with oddball anecdotal stories.  

You can do well without it too.  HR departments at many companies seem to ignore engineering skills in favor of business and soft skill mumbo jumbo when it comes to promotions anyway.  Don't expect anyone to kiss your butt for it either.  

You may discover, as I did, there is a group of fairly well skilled pilots that know each other and network a bit within you organization already.  It's a great group to network with to get a sense of what's really going on too.

There is a shortage of pilots.  It's great fun.  It will help you put a lot of things in context and you'll be able to simply understand the big picture so much better.  

I personally started deriving far more satisfaction out of my job despite the fact that the type of flying I do is not related much to the type of projects I work on. For many people, this line of work it seems to be just a job where people push paper around and meet deadlines.  For me, a lot ties in with what I do for fun too. I wish I started sooner.
 

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

2
Wow.. This is a must for me to reply.  I was in your shoes about 23 years ago.  Dare I say exactly--with a twist.

Graduated BSME from University of Florida.  I wanted to be a pilot, and actually had to "trade in" my ROTC engineering scholarship to accept the pilot slot.  Unfortunately, after graduation, they cut pilot production nearly in half, and I was randomly in the "cut" half.  So they sent me off to be an engineer anyway!  I did development engineering (62xx was the career field if I remember right).  It was good engineering experience and I designed parts that I would eventually fly later as a pilot.  In the process there, I got my Masters Degree and the beginning four-years of engineering experience was enough to eventually get my P.E. license.  After winning a major command engineering award, I had a chance to tell the ranking guy my story, and how I wanted to fly.  Three weeks later I was in flight school, one year later I was flying an F-16, and a year after that I was in combat over Iraq.

With this background, I will offer you the following:

1.  Most of 62Es comments above are spot on.  There is a lot of mis-info otherwise, so proceed with caution. I.e. the flying commitment is EIGHT YEARS after a year-long flight school.  

2.  You fly, because you want to fly.  Expect to fly a lot.  That is if you get through flight school, and all the other rigors--it's not a given.  You typically won't have time to get a master's while you are operational.  They demand your full attention and then some.  If you try to juggle flying/family/masters, expect failure in (at least) one of the three areas.  Operational flying is--among other things--a leadership factory.  Young men go in, leaders come out three years later.  Then they expect you to lead.. or you could go to test pilot school.

3.  Lately, if you are at the top of your class, you may still get an unmanned aerial system (UAS).  I.e. flying a predator in Afghanistan from the desert in Nevada.  This may be a fit for you.  In fact, if you let it be known you WANTED this, you'd probably get it.  This seems to fit an engineering mind better than other flying jobs.  

4.  In the F-16 squadron I kept my engineering skills on the down-low.  People looked at you funny if you rattled off too much in-detail info.  You really have to temper some of the skills you developed to fit the culture, but you learn new skills.  "Paralysis by analysis" will no longer exist for you.  You will be an expert in risk management.  Your quick-math skills will save your life one day, or lack thereof will kill you.  I stayed fresh on my own though by getting a second master's degree right before retirement (in a non-flying job), and just lots of tinkering.

5.  Evaluate design applications and requirements.  You bet.  In fact, as a pilot, I got to fly with a piece of equipment I designed as a young engineer.  I'm happy to say 20 years, later, the structural fix I put in has had zero failures.  As the "user" you have a mysterious sense of credibility when working issues back home.

6.  Now the dark side.  The flying game will end.  As an analogy, it's like a professional sports team... They keep 'em young, and when you get older, you go on to do things like coach, or commentator. When I was one year out from retirement, I prepared a flying resume for the airlines, and an engineering resume as well.  Airlines aren't hiring--I expected that. But ah ha! I've got engineering as a back up!  I must have sent out 1000 resume's over the course of a year.  It wasn't a bad resume:  MSAE, BSME, P.E., but the experience--although four years of really good work--was 15 years old.  I received exactly one engineering interview, and that was only due to my F-16 experience.  When we came to the salary discussion, it was so shockingly low, that I simply could not accept it.  I'm afraid if I am going to get back into engineering, I'll have to start my own company or something, because the phone's not ringing off the hook.  The good news is that I found an aviation consulting job that quite literally doubled my previous salary, and I only work 6 mo/yr.  At this point, I'm happy "tinkering" in my six months off, contributing my engineering to the open-source gang.  I still miss "real" engineering, and I send out resumes looking for that perfect fit between aviation and engineering, but I'm not holding my breath.  Aviation folks don't care much about masters degrees and P.E.s, Engineering folks don't care much about type ratings, flight hours, or emergency procedures.

Would I do it different? No.  But I wanted to be a pilot first, engineer (close) second.  It looks like you may have these priorities transposed, which will change your game plan.

BLOB: (bottom line on bottom) If you want to be an engineer, turn down the pilot slot.  Be firm with your recruiter.  As an engineer they will send you (full pay) to get your ENGINEERING masters among other things. You may design a little, but once you make Captain (if not before) you will be in Engineering Management, managing $million if not $billion contracts.  You will see everything. You will develop engineering skills, leadership, and precious contacts in this regard.  

If you want to be a pilot--but your heart still tugs to do engineering, then go to pilot training, do well--(and you will do well as long as you don't over-think things) you can get a UAS, or take a jet and try to go to Test Pilot School (TPS).  If you get TPS (competitive position after 1000 hours of flight time), they will send you to get an Engineering Master's Degree, then on to Edwards where you will fly every airplane in the inventory, and have a real shot at being an astronaut.

Regardless, the world is yours.  Make a decision and go get it.

-Darrell
ret USAF









 

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

(OP)
Thanks a lot Darrell, that's quite a story.  I have actually come to a decision since I last posted here.  Although flying is absolutely among the top experiences of my life, the only aviation career path I'm really interested in is test piloting (you were spot on) and I decided it was too specialized for me to pursue and risk being stuck in a transport... I still think piloting a transport would be cool... I just don't want a career of it.

So I've taken the next logical step and I'll be pursuing TPS from the other side as a flight test engineer.  I'm actually a member of the Society of Flight Test Engineers and I'll be flight testing an SR20 next semester, so I have some high hopes about that.  I'll be submitting my Air Force application to the upcoming technical board as well.

I know the TPS board is extremely competitive (one of my references was selected as a secondary) so if anyone has any advice on that, I'd love to hear it.

Finally, as soon as I get the money, I'll definately keep flying.  I think I'll enjoy it more as a hobby than as a career anyways ;)

 

The story so far:
In the beginning the Universe was created.
This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.  

RE: Pilot Experience as an Engineer

Go fly !!

There are bold pilots and old pilots - but NO old, bold pilots.

It is a young man/woman's sport and do it NOW!!!

I regret that it never happened for me and now I am 59

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources