×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Stress Relief Article

Stress Relief Article

Stress Relief Article

(OP)
Daniel Herring, aka "The Heat Treat Doctor" had an article in the latest issue of Industrial Heating about stress relief. One of his points was that for a stress relief heat treatment to be successful, the parts must not be rapidly cooled. "Rapid cooling will only serve to re-introduce stess, and this is the most common mistake made in stress-relief operations." Having never heard anything like this, I am skeptical. I am of the impression that once the part is at a temperature sufficient to reduce the material's yield strength, stress relief happens via a creep mechanism and subsequent cooling rate has no effect on the stress outcome. What do you guys think?

RE: Stress Relief Article

Rapid cooling will undoubtedly induce new residual stress.

RE: Stress Relief Article

Based on data I have seen and my years of involvement with various Codes and Standards, for a subcritical stress relief once the metal temperature is below 800 deg F, cooling rate can be increased from a specified cooling rate.  

Basically, the concern is to avoid harmful thermal gradients to the component. The 800 deg F limitation has been established by experience and means that once the part falls below 800 deg F, one can cool the part in air or moving without a specified cooling rate.

Would I use a quenching medium to cool the part from 799 deg F to ambient temperature, no, because you still have thermal gradients upon cooling. Part geometry will influence how quickly one can cool from 800 deg F without introducing harmful thermal gradients.

 

RE: Stress Relief Article

While creep may be operative, thermal expansion and contraction are present and plastic deformation via dislocation motion may be present too.  The rapid cooling, leading to thermal gradients, can result in residual stresses.  Certainly these stresses are smaller than those induced by cold work or phase changes, but they may be significant to the product.

RE: Stress Relief Article

Rapid cooling will introduce stresses, but not as highly localized as the initial stresses concentrated at weld joints.  The new stresses will be more a function of the self-restraint of the component.  This could still be deleterious under the wrong set of circumstances.   

RE: Stress Relief Article

Please we could consult the TTT diagram for the specific material of interest?

 

RE: Stress Relief Article

(OP)
TTT diagram describes cooling rates vs transformation microstructure. It would be of no use in steels stress relieved at temperatures below Ac1.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources