×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

PWM Motor Controller/Amplifier

PWM Motor Controller/Amplifier

PWM Motor Controller/Amplifier

(OP)
I'm working on an application where I need to intercept an existing PWM signal (~120Hz, 0-12.0V) - which is limited to 20A max current - and output an identical signal with a capacity of up to 60A.  The signal controls a single brushless DC motor but my application will add another (identical) motor in parallel with the first (and possibly 2 more motors).

Based on my limited understanding (never worked with any kind of transistors) and what I've been able to gather researching online, I thought N-channel MOSFET's might be just the thing and I've come up with the attached circuit that I believe will meet my needs.

I'm considering using a pair of IXYS HiPerFET IXFE48N50Q in parallel to give plenty of overhead.  Am I on the right track with the circuit design?  If so, are the IXYS units a good fit (if a little expensive)?

Link to IXYS specs: http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=IXFE48N50Q-ND

Appreciate any insight/feedback.

Mikah B.
www.allanglesdesign.com

RE: PWM Motor Controller/Amplifier

(OP)
We will turn it over to an EE if this direction looks promising as a solution to this need.

Is the concept sound or are we barking up the wrong tree?  There are other more "brute force" simple solutions, but this seems like it could be elegant and cost-effective for our need.

Mikah B.
www.allanglesdesign.com

RE: PWM Motor Controller/Amplifier

(OP)
The module that currently generates the PWM signal also implements the control logic and is a CAN bus node - neither simple nor inexpensive to reproduce.  We have verified through experimentation that the control logic is able to compensate (it's closed loop) for the additional motor.  All we need is more amperage capacity to drive an additional motor or two.

You're right, it is a fair amount of current.  The FET I spec'd is rated for 41A max continuous drain.  I expect the system to consume about 30A during normal continuous operation which is why I chose a pair of FET's in parallel.  My thought was that by running two FET's in saturation but well below their capacity, I could avoid excessive heat buildup.  Demand could spike as high as 60A for short periods of time (4-8 seconds).

Mikah B.
www.allanglesdesign.com

RE: PWM Motor Controller/Amplifier

Will the loop closure include the other motors with the new design?  If not, you'll be controlling one motor nicely and the other two, well...

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: PWM Motor Controller/Amplifier

(OP)
Yes, Dan - both motors will be included in the loop.  I've added a 2nd motor to the diagram to indicate how it will fall in place.  Physically, the flyback diode will be built in to the new device across the output connectors.  But, both driven motors will essentially share the same signal.  We've tried it with two motors pulling on the original (signal-generating) module and it worked fantastically, but I cannot in good conscience let that go because it is only a matter of time before the additional current draw burns up something expensive.

Mikah B.
www.allanglesdesign.com

RE: PWM Motor Controller/Amplifier

My forte is definitely not power (or motors), but placing motor coils in parallel and expecting them to work identically doesn't sound wise... one will invariably work harder than the other.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: PWM Motor Controller/Amplifier

(OP)
Dan - no need for the motors to perform identically, in fact it would be impossible as they will probably never see identical loads - though it should be close.  If the circuit was prone to one motor ALWAYS doing the heavier lifting, that could be a concern.  My expectation, though, is that the circuit doesn't care much and the load balance will come down to the mechanical design.

IRstuff: Like I said, I will get an EE to look at it if the concept has merit.  I just want to have my homework well and truly in order first.

Mikah B.
www.allanglesdesign.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources