×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Metering CT vs. Protection CT
2

Metering CT vs. Protection CT

Metering CT vs. Protection CT

(OP)
Hi everyone

On a newly buildt substation, on the 380V side, faultlevel of almost 32kA, I've noticed something. The CT's been use there is 3200/1, but it is metering CT's. When I asked one of the guys if it is correct, (in my opinion it must be 10P10 protection CT's, otherwise the CT's would saturate under a big fault) he told me that the relay been used is an electronic relay with a very low burden. So in fact is there nothing wrong with metering CT's! Is this statement true?

regards

RE: Metering CT vs. Protection CT


I don't what know the contract language specifies, but I'd ask for calculations and CT manufacturer’s literature supporting that.  Then see that the label information on the CT matches/supports the paper.   
  

RE: Metering CT vs. Protection CT

(OP)
It doesn't matter if the relay has a small burden, the point is that the CTs must be protection class, such that they will transform the fault current. The metering CTs are purposely designed to saturate just above their primary ratio and hence will not provide the protection relay with a true representation of the fault current.

RE: Metering CT vs. Protection CT

I'm no expert, but it certainly sounds reasonable to me. Saturation depends on the product of current and burden impedance.  If you cut the burden impedance by factor of 10 you should be able to go almost a factor of 10 higher in current without saturating.

RE: Metering CT vs. Protection CT

In modern digital relays, when the relay is used for metering, many protection, data/event logging and many other functions, the C.T used is for the protection C.T.

Just to illustrate an example,
 we are using GE Multilin relay SR489, which has multifunctions like,
  Overcurent/earthfault
  differential protection and all other generator protection in one relay.
  metering
  data logginh and communication with SCADA.
  disturbance recorder etc.

Now we require to give single C.T input. which one of the following to choose?
 - Class x (suitable for differential protection)
 - protection C.T 5P10
 - metering C.T (cl 0.5)


 we have choosen C.T of class 5P10 in the line as well as neutral end C.T.

If any further technical details on the above is required, please let me know.

RE: Metering CT vs. Protection CT

You are able to purchase hybrid Metering/Protection class CTs for modern relays. They are basically the same core material as used in metering class CTs, but designed to provide the fault current too.
I agree with busbar, you should check the claculations otherise you've got yourself a very expensive ammeter !

RE: Metering CT vs. Protection CT

As we know, to protect the instrument in the secondary of the metering CT, there is a factor Fs ( instrumnet security factor) for metering CT, it means when a fault occurs in the primary, the ration of growing about the secondary current can not be as high as the primary side. if the metering CT used for protection, the growing current will not be appeared accurately. That will strongly affected protection time and so on. in one word, it is not suitable to use the metering CT instead of the protection CT.

RE: Metering CT vs. Protection CT

2
If the CT has a high enough knee-point voltage to overcome the winding resistance and the relay burden at the maximum fault level, it will work irrespective of what it is called.  Do a mag curve and resistance check and you'll soon know the answer.

Bung
Life is non-linear...

RE: Metering CT vs. Protection CT

Just want to add another real life condition.  At one of our power stations the fault recorder installation was a retrofit.  Not enough "protection CT" cores were available, however there was a "metering" CT core spare.  With the low secondary burden measured and used in the calculations it seemed to be OK.  Then we had a generator "switch on to standstill" incident.  The recorded currents showed no signs of saturation with this rather severe fault.  Clipping was evident in the first culsy but was due to the 12bit resolution of the recorder.  (full scale not big enough vs lousy resoltion at noraml loads).  It must be appreciated that the Class 0.1 CT will saturate at about 5 times at rated burden.  Therfore if the connected burden is much lower than rated burden, then the accuracy limiting factor increases substantially.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources