rt1 vs rt2
rt1 vs rt2
(OP)
Can anyone explain RT1 vs RT2. Everywhere I look, I seem to get a different answer. It seems the more I dig, the more confused I get.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: rt1 vs rt2
RE: rt1 vs rt2
It is Radiographic Testing personnel qualifications,
Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3
Regards.
Kiwi
RE: rt1 vs rt2
RE: rt1 vs rt2
As SnTman has stated - context of enquiry is required.
Eddycurrentguy has given a different context to the one listed by me but it is a correct response.
Not sure about ASNT but British / European / Australian and New Zealand NDT documents / reports abbreviate Radiographic Testing Level 2 to RT 2 as an example (refer ISO 9712 Section 6)
Regards,
Kiwi
RE: rt1 vs rt2
RE: rt1 vs rt2
RE: rt1 vs rt2
david339933, UW-11(a)5 has been discussed numerous times in the B&PV forum and perhaps in the ASME Code forum as well. Tried a search?
Regards,
Mike
RE: rt1 vs rt2
UG 116(e)(2) spells out the requirements for RT-2 pretty clearly. Have you reviewed this? If so and you're still unclear it would help if you could be more specific with your question.
RE: rt1 vs rt2
RE: rt1 vs rt2
RE: rt1 vs rt2
RE: rt1 vs rt2
That also might be more RT than required. Long seams 100% and spot on the round seams per UW 52. ( RT of Tees isn't mandatory)
You're choice of words causes me to think you may be overlapping requirements for applying UW11(a)(5)(b) on a vessel receiving spot RT. ( RT 4) however, even in that case RT on Tees isn't mandatory.
RE: rt1 vs rt2
RE: rt1 vs rt2
RE: rt1 vs rt2