×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Long-slotted holes as expansion joint
7

Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

(OP)
What is your opinion on the use of long-slotted holes to accommodate thermal/wind induced movements (not temporary but as a permanent expansion joint)? The long slot is in the horizontal direction; gravity load is normal to the direction of the slot. I'm looking for references that advise against this practice.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

They are usually detailed and installed incorrectly to work for the long term.  If you use it, make sure there is a slip pad between steel surfaces and that the bolts are finger tight but with a jam nut.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

(OP)
slickdeals: thank you!

Are there any codes, design guides etc that doesn't allow the use of long-slotted holes for this purpose? As far as I can tell the AISC manual and the AISC high strength bolt design guide doesn't say anything about accommodating movement along the slot; just that the loads should be close to normal to the direction of the slot.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

2
Slickdeals beat me to it.  See also http://failures.wikispaces.com/David+L.+Lawrence+Convention+Center.

I've always thought these connections violate the specification anyway.  The spec doesn't make allowance for shear being tranferred through bolts in a joint that are not at least snug tight.  These bolts are only finger tight, and they are being used to transfer shear load.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

I use them, detailed them similar to Ron's explanation, and I require a hold and inspect for the contract. I don't think an article about a bridge expansion joint should be used for all structure types for recommendation on expansion joints. I have three buildings over 200m long that have expansion joints, have reviewed the buildings over the past 5 years and as of yet they are working great.  As for the length of building that requires an expansion joint, while that is another question.  

ANY FOOL CAN DESIGN A STRUCTURE. IT TAKES AN ENGINEER TO DESIGN A CONNECTION."
 

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

I think you need to address all of the "awe-sh*ts" and "I didn't think that would matter" and "what-else-could-go-wrong" problems very, very carefully.

For example: Rust (or dirt, slime, paint, barnacles (?) and biologic trash like pigeon poop or the like) in the joint, slot, and between the bolts and the supposedly sliding part of the three pieces.  Galvanic corrosion, flooding or roof leaks, new insulation in ten years, new paint, sand-blast residue not removed, grit and sweeping from later renovations will foul the supposedly "open" slots and prevent movement.  (Each part ( the bolt, the beam, and the supported/supporting steel) have to remain free for the life of the building - and that's very hard to guarantee in the real world for even four to ten years.

Assume your design is perfect and will be kept perfect over the life of the building.  But this means the mechanical parts of your assumed design need to be verified, then re-inspected regularly during construction of every joint.  Unfortunately, without very, very diligent inspections, today's installers won't do it themselves, nor will they always ensure their newbies and apprentices will do the assembly with the care and attention  to exact detail that your drawing must assume will be followed.   Too much day labor, temp labor, and unskilled labor is used today to avoid precautions that - in year's past - could be taken for granted.  

It is hard enough to even get all the bolts, washers, and nuts mounted in conventional steel joints even made up when they are all identical, much less fully torqued properly.  And here you are demanding that some bolts are snug, some torques tightly, some with backing nuts ......

The mechanical details above are good.   They are proper for designing such a flexible joint in the building. But if you can avoid using them - all the better.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

Ron didn't mention it, but do not get peanut butter on the Jam nut.    

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

 

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

(OP)
nutte: "The spec doesn't make allowance for shear being tranferred through bolts in a joint that are not at least snug tight. "

what is this spec you are referring to?

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

I've never allowed slotted holes to be used in an expansion joint as the direct shear support mechanism.  Grinding of the bolts with cyclical building expansion-contraction just doesn't "feel" right and I'd always use a seated connection with teflon/slide bearings instead....or preferably a double column system.

 

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

I do not agree the statement of the slot holes to build expansion joints have to be discarded.

I have read the paper and it like the joint was not the proper one and was not carefully designed.

The sloted hole is normally used on seated beam to void unseated. So the bolts are locked with two nuts and the suface is the one that takes vertical forces. This is a tipical detail on expansion joints on buildings.

I think the way it is said on several reports "the failure of structures is 50% by poor detailing, the other 50% are other reasons".

 

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

I agree with JAE that a double column system is the better way to go.

Mike...some of the frozen joints I've seen could have used a little peanut butter...and I prefer grape jam.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

2
I think everyone else has said it...  DO NOT USE LONG SLOT AS AN EXPANSION JOINT.  

Long slots used in the stability angle of a seat connection is intended to avoid rigidity in the connection.  The bolts are not in bearing, which can resist slippage.  The connection shear is taken in the bearing seat connection only.  With the addition of slide bearing pads, you have an expansion joint.  

I have reviewed the forensic report on the Pittsburg Convention Center, and several factors contributed to the poor movement in the knife connections that failed.  The actual failures were in the welds of the knife angles to the columns.  The lack of slippage in the angles induced large axial loads and prying in the welds of the outstanding angle legs.  As a practical connection it is impossible to determine the effects of surface prep, bolt plowing, and connection eccentricity on the expansion/contraction movement require by the connection.   

http://www.FerrellEngineering.com

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

The condition and failures in Pitsburg were not limited to the exterior bridge area only.  All expansion joints were retrofitted with slide bearing seat connections.  The most significant failure was due to the extreme temperature changes and contraction of the concrete, while supporting the load of a semi truck.  But nearly all the expansion joints showed distress and many had cracked welds.  

http://www.FerrellEngineering.com

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

Just one more vote for prohibition of this type joint for support of large gravity loads, e.g. floor beams.  However, the OP's query was originally about thermal and wind induced movement with no mention of the type members involved.  I think slotted connections can work in light roof structures, especially where snow loads are not involved.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

This is a great thread.

I never never never use slotted holes for expansion. Some old book I can not find anymore suggested not to use these when vertical reaction exceeds 12 tons metric(26kips).

Next I wouldnt use anything that is not likely to pull itself back gracefully when the expansion is gone.

If my boss forces me to use them(he is a proponent), then I would put a plate with rounded top at contact, to cut down friction and sticking, or wait until he doesnt watch and go on with PTFE or elastomer

respects
ijr

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

(OP)
Thanks to everyone who shared their opinion. I'm on the camp that says a shear connection with long slotted hole for expansion is not a good idea.

Now I need to find code references, provisions etc to back this up. Has anyone seen something to this effect anywhere?

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

The connection described by the OP is a bad idea.

Because some have used it successfully means absolutely nothing to me.

I have recently done some investigation into thermal effects on connections in some industrial buildings. The thermal effects are very hard to quantify.
IMO, if you cannot accurately determine the effects of thermal and wind on your connection, you have to eliminate that force....best way is a double column row.

I agree with JAE's description.

How can one depended on a direct bearing shear connection to slide?
How do you determine the force at which the connection will slide?
This detail screams of fatigue problems.  

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

Another brief article on the conference center connection from ENR attached.  

zoparrat, there is no code reference to back not using this detail, its just good engineering judgement.  The code cannot specifically exclude every poor detail anyone can dream up.  

 

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

Quote:

The code cannot specifically exclude every poor detail anyone can dream up.  

Agree with that.  The codes identify good practice.  Not too many sections of codes and specs spend time identifying bad practices.

 

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

zoparrat
Your best spec argument may be that there is no spec allowing it either.  RCSC/AISC does not allow the use of finger tight bolts in a structural bearing connection.  They also do not allow the use of a non-steel filler, which eliminates the use of Teflon between the plies.  Thirdly, snug-tight, the least restrictive installation pretension, requires that all plies be pulled into firm contact.  

It will be difficult to find a spec that specifically addresses the use of long slotted bearing connection as expansion joints.  Especially when many of the parameters are already specifically rejected.   

http://www.FerrellEngineering.com

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

Quote (zoparrat):

nutte: "The spec doesn't make allowance for shear being tranferred through bolts in a joint that are not at least snug tight. "what is this spec you are referring to?
The 2005 AISC specification for steel buildings says in J3.1 (paraphrased): bolts must be pretensioned, except in certain cases where snug tight bolts are acceptable.  Finger-tight bolts are neither pretensioned or snug tight, so they would appear to be prohibited.

The 2004 RCSC bolt specification (referenced by the AISC specification), section 4, says that joints with fasteners loaded in shear shall be snug-tightened, pretensioned, or slip critical.  "Finger-tight" does not fall within any of these categories.

Not only is this detail a bad idea, it also violates the applicable specifications.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

What would be bringing us when finding any structural capacity for a slotted bolt connection as a buildability allowance?
 

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

(OP)
connectegr: I'm looking at the 2009 RCSC spec and trying to find where it states that non-steel washers are not allowed. Do you know where this is stated? I found the following:

6.1.2. Slotted Hole: When a slotted hole occurs in an outer ply, an ASTM F436 washer or 5/16 in. thick common plate washer shall be used as required to completely cover the hole.

Can't a common plate washer be made of any type of material?

 

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

(OP)
Also I couldn't find anything that rules out the use of a non-standard washer between plies for a slotted connection. The above section is a requirement for the outer ply only.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

Look at section 3.1 (in the 2004 RCSC specification).  It says anything between the head and nut must be steel.

You don't need washers between inner plies of a bolted joint.

RE: Long-slotted holes as expansion joint

Refer to Bolted Parts 3.1
All connected plies that are within the grip of the bolt and any material that are used under the head or nut shall be steel...

http://www.FerrellEngineering.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources