×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Orifice meter - wrong installation

Orifice meter - wrong installation

Orifice meter - wrong installation

(OP)
We have an gas orifice meter that was wrongly installed, with the conical opening facing the wrong way. Unfortunately there are was external indication of flow direction, and assurances had been given that it was correctly installed - something that could probably justify a separate thread on QA, but I'll pass on that subject for now. smile

Anyway, when the orifice plate was repositioned, measured flowrates increased by about 10-15 percent (flow is unfortunately not constant, so a direct comparison is not possible), and I was wondering if there is any way to recalculate the old (erroneous) readings that we have?

RE: Orifice meter - wrong installation

the quick answer is yes but you have to use the reverse flow coefficients for the plate (if you can find them. some of the metering companies can run a calc for you

RE: Orifice meter - wrong installation

Consider advising whether this is a custody transfer, related high-accuracy flow meter, or internal operating unit flow meter that can handle less precision.

RE: Orifice meter - wrong installation

I'm surprised that the error was only 10-15%, numbers I usually see are above 25%.  I've never found a reliable way correct a meter for a backwards plate, and I've looked for years.  I took a test trailer to CEESI (a big meter test station in Colorado) quite a few years ago.  We finished our testing a bit early and tacked on some backwards plate tests.  I got the data and found that the error is very much Reynolds Number and beta ratio dependent.  I spent several weeks manipulating that data over the next couple of years and if there is a decent correlation I never found it.

When I was operating a gathering system we had a couple of big wells get backwards plates.  I applied a 26% factor to the data and my system material balance went from +5% to +2% (there were other problems in the system at that time as well).  The problem with that technique is that it is rare to have the ability to do a material balance because someone else usually operates the aggregation meter.

David

RE: Orifice meter - wrong installation

(OP)
Thanks all!

It is (unfortunately) a fiscal meter, although the measurement is only for injection gas, for which the company is obliged (and previously seemed to fail) to provide a minimum amount of throughput per day.

Indications are that measurement has been off by about 15-20%, but it appears that making an accurate calcualtion of what amount has been underreported is rather difficult.

Appreciate the leads given above, though - at least it gives me something to work with.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources