×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Approach Slab Omission from Bridge
2

Approach Slab Omission from Bridge

Approach Slab Omission from Bridge

(OP)
We have a bridge located inside a county park and will have very low daily traffic.  The G.C. just got bids for the bridge and they are higher than expected.  We are looking at ways to cut costs.  One idea is to remove the approach slabs, which are a big cost item for this small single span bridge.  Does anyone have a good resource showing what type of subgrade should be placed under the asphalt at the bridge interface to help prevent settlement between the asphalt surface and the bridge?

Thanks!  

RE: Approach Slab Omission from Bridge

Solid concrete 20 feet deep?

I don't think you can ever avoid settlement completely.  This would become an on-going maintenance cost vs. the up-front one time cost of the approach slab.  

The amount of traffic wouldn't change anything - the settlement occurs due to the build-up of the grade at the bridge end...i.e. the soil self-weight creates long term settlements.

 

RE: Approach Slab Omission from Bridge

I'm sure you have, but just a friendly reminder to check with the Owner. Most counties follow state DOT guidelines for bridge design, and many states require approach slabs now days regardless of projected ADT.  

RE: Approach Slab Omission from Bridge

Some states have taken to elminate expensive approach slabs on low volume roads.  They'll use asphalt and when settlement occurs it can be repaved easily.

Other options are to preload the fills to accelerate any settlement that may be expected thereby minimizing.

Another option that is becoming frequent is to use a slab on grade as the approach slab rather than a one slab supprted on the pavement notch (abutment) and sleeper slab.  This reduces the amount of reinforcing greatly.

Regards,
Qshake
pipe
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.
 

RE: Approach Slab Omission from Bridge

(OP)
Qshake,

Do you have any links with any white paper or other write-ups on this?  I want to be able to provide the owner with examples that other DOT's are doing this.

Thanks!

RE: Approach Slab Omission from Bridge

(OP)
Thanks Qshake - I have found a few things, but figured I'd ask.

RE: Approach Slab Omission from Bridge

I recently saw an article on using controlled low strength material (AKA flowable fill, K-crete) for utility trenches to control settlement.

Would that be a possible replacement for structural fill in some applications? I'm thinking it might be more suited for stub abutments than high abutments due to the need to contain it, higher cost than structural fill, etc.

     Maybe the tyranny of Murphy is the penalty for hubris.  - http://xkcd.com/319/
 

RE: Approach Slab Omission from Bridge

My firm has encountered some joint issues with County bridges not having approach slabs.  One particular bridge had a concrete deck with no approach slab.  They had a 1'-6" wide backwall that they brought up to the road grade in order to embed armoring angles for the joint.  As the road settled, the backwall was repeatedly impacted by snow plows, and eventually grabbed the armoring angle, which caused a lot of damage to the plow.  Our recommendation was to create "mini" approach slabs that were 4'-6" long (see attached detail).  This didn't help with the settling, but it, at the very least, moved the impacts away from the joint.  I haven't been back to the bridge to see if the slab has cracked above the back of the backwall.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources