×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

load specs for OEM-type ball joints

load specs for OEM-type ball joints

load specs for OEM-type ball joints

(OP)
I'd like to find load ratings and specs for various ball joints-

I'm reworking a suspension and would like the spring loading on the lower arm instead of strut/upper arm.
I'm sure the original lower ball joint isn't rated to carry spring forces, so maybe I can find a standard /similar unit that is.

Suggestions?

Jay Maechtlen
http://www.laserpubs.com/techcomm

RE: load specs for OEM-type ball joints

Jay, I had an old Moog pamphlet from the 60's that had a complete breakdown of ball joints and tie rod ends including, if memory serves, load capacities.  I don't have it any longer but, it did exist and therefor you might try Moog's tech line.  Also, Summit Racing has a chassis tech that I have found useful in the past.  Stock car stuff, but that may be more relevant to your project.  
My "ball joint" difficulties in the past were more often in the method of mounting as opposed to the actual load rating of the joint.  If I can help, give me a call.

Rod

RE: load specs for OEM-type ball joints

One option would be to use Aurora heim joints instead, you can buy the naked SBJ, you don't have to buy a tie rod. They have a complete catalogue, and several grades in each size.

You'll be changing the direction of the major laod path, this is non triival. Incidentally if you use a tie rod make sure that you have the ball joint in compression, they are significantly weaker in tension.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies  http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: load specs for OEM-type ball joints

(OP)
Yes, I would be changing the load path.
I recall some 50's and 60's American cars had lower ball joints carrying the load with studs in tension.
A brute-force approach might be to choose one from a medium to large car and just modify the LCA and/or stud taper to make it fit.

Nobody will ever mistake this vehicle for stock anything, so I don't have to worry about tripping up future owners.

Food for thought, Thanks.
 

Jay Maechtlen
http://www.laserpubs.com/techcomm

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources