×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Analog for Allen-Bradley Rockwell

Analog for Allen-Bradley Rockwell

Analog for Allen-Bradley Rockwell

(OP)
I am looking for a third party supplier that can provide an analog module with higher resolution than 16/15 bit currently available in the A-B product line.

I this is not available would I be able to find this type of input sensitivity in another brand Siemens, Automation Direct etc.

 

RE: Analog for Allen-Bradley Rockwell

Analog in/out of ab contrologix is this
4-byte floating-point number    -3.402823E38 to -1.1754944E-38

Maybe your talking PLC5 or slc500?  Which is legacy products.


 

RE: Analog for Allen-Bradley Rockwell

(OP)
Thanks for the input I looked up the specifications on a 1756-IF8 and the Input Range and Resolution is 15/16 bit.

You are correct the data format is Floating point IEEE 32 bit.

I am looking for a converter with greater than 16 bit Range and Resolution specs.

I am guessing this would have to be from a third party supplier.
 

RE: Analog for Allen-Bradley Rockwell

What you get on analog input resolution is based on the type of A/D converter used and is always a compromise between speed, noise immunity, resolution and cost. PLCs tend to go for the middle ground, partly because PLC system design is generally optimized for fast sequential logic solving, so adding something slower but with higher resolution is going to potentially bog down the primary mission of the device. DCS systems on the other hand use much more powerful processors so they can deal with the higher resolution inputs (i.e. up to 24 bit). But that capability comes at substantially higher cost as a control system, hence their primary mission being plant wide process controls, not machine controls. PLCs have been used for plant wide control systems and SCADA systems, but not typically when high analog resolution is a necessity. Jut like in horse racing, you have to know your horse before you put your money on it.

As my old mentor first told me when I asked about the difference between a DCS and a PLC, he said "PLCs make things, quickly; DCS systems make stuff, accurately."

All that said, Siemens uses their S7-400 PLC I/O hardware for their PCS-7 DCS system, and because of that, they have Analog cards with 24 bit resolution A/D converters (although you only can use 20 bits + sign I think). Of course, that is their most expensive PLC system as well. I think the S7-300 has higher than 16 bit A/d converters but you only can use up to 16 bit on some types of signals.

Have you considered using a separate stand-alone PID controller with higher resolution for direct control of that process and then extracting only pertinent data from is for use in the PLC program?

"Dear future generations: Please accept our apologies. We were rolling drunk on petroleum."
— Kilgore Trout (via Kurt Vonnegut)
  
For the best use of Eng-Tips, please click here -> FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources